Skip to main content

Security report for centralclinic.hu

Central Clinic · Healthcare · Hungary

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Central Clinic is a private healthcare provider located in the heart of Budapest, Hungary, offering a broad range of medical specialties including surgery, dermatology, ophthalmology, cardiology, and more. The clinic emphasizes high-quality care with internationally recognized doctors and provides convenient online appointment booking and consultation services. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with good content quality and user experience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, and OptiMonk. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers and policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is basic with no explicit privacy policy page found, but cookie consent is implemented. WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy and consistency of the domain registration with the business identity. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-positioned in the private healthcare market in Hungary.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching centralclinic.hu

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The clinic targets general consumers seeking private medical care in Budapest, leveraging a multi-specialty approach to attract a wide patient base. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on premium healthcare delivery with online convenience features. The presence of multiple positive user reviews and ratings enhances credibility and market positioning. Partnerships with dental clinics and external appointment platforms indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The website content and structure support patient engagement and conversion. Growth potential exists through expanded digital marketing and enhanced patient communication channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and cookie consent compliance. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and some recommended security headers suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate risks. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency in security management. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be strengthened to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data processing and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Central Clinic
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Central Clinic
Description
A Central Clinic egy magas minőségű magánklinika a belváros szívében. Több, mint 8 szakrendeléssel, nemzetközileg is elismert orvosokkal. Online időpontfoglalási és online konzultációs lehetőség. Sebészet | Bőrgyógyászat | Plasztikai sebészet | Hematológia | Ultrahang | Angiológia | Gasztroenterológia | Fül-orr gégésze
Key services
Sebészet, Bőrgyógyászat, Plasztikai sebészet, Hematológia, Ultrahang, Angiológia, Gasztroenterológia, Fül-orr gégészet, Diabetológia, Kardiológia
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, OptiMonk, CookieYes
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Ads
Marketing tools
OptiMonk, CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional private healthcare clinic site based in Budapest, Hungary.
  2. Multiple specialties and doctors listed with detailed service pages.
  3. Strong presence of user reviews and ratings integrated via structured data.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms are implemented but no explicit privacy policy page found.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information published.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, supported by Yoast SEO for search optimization. Integration of Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, and OptiMonk indicates a mature digital marketing and analytics setup. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses multiple external domains for scripts and tracking, which should be monitored for security and privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with centralclinic.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review centralclinic.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.