Skip to main content

Security report for ceitec.de

CEITEC Inh. Carsten Eikmeier e.K. · Energy · Germany

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CEITEC Inh. Carsten Eikmeier e.K. is a small German company specializing in consulting, sales, and installation of quality equipment for leisure facilities, particularly in camping and water sports tourism. Established since 1993, the company emphasizes personalized service, reliability, and sustainable product offerings to enhance the attractiveness and value of client facilities. Their target audience includes operators of campgrounds, marinas, and recreational sites within Germany. The website is built on WordPress with common plugins and technologies, providing a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA usage, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent banner but no privacy policy page found. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ceitec.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy and transportation sectors related to leisure tourism infrastructure. Their business model is B2B, focusing on consulting and supplying tailored solutions for camping and marina facilities. The firm leverages long-standing industry experience and personalized customer relationships as competitive advantages. Revenue streams likely include product sales, installation services, and consulting. The website indicates active engagement with social media platforms and participation in industry events. Growth indicators include recent blog posts about upcoming trade fairs and new product launches. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed but includes standard social media and hosting providers. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance digital maturity through improved security policies and privacy compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and Google reCAPTCHA is used to protect forms from automated abuse. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which may hinder timely reporting and remediation of security issues. Data protection practices are partially addressed via cookie consent, but lack a formal privacy policy. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the website. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved to meet higher compliance standards such as GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy to address GDPR compliance and inform users about data handling.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated software.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CEITEC Inh. Carsten Eikmeier e.K.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CEITEC Inh. Carsten Eikmeier e.K.
Description
CEITEC specializes in consulting and selling quality and comfort-enhancing products for leisure facilities, focusing on camping and water sports tourism. They provide tailored individual solutions, high-quality equipment, and installation services to increase attractiveness and value creation for leisure facilities.
Key services
Consulting, Sales of equipment for camping and water sports facilities, Installation and service, Access control systems, Power distribution and water supply solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, Slider Revolution, Contact Form 7, Cookie Notice plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in German language targeting German leisure facility operators.
  3. No privacy policy page found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented and functional.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Website uses standard WordPress plugins and themes with moderate performance.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond reCAPTCHA.
  9. Social media presence includes Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram with official company accounts.
  10. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using version 6.8.2 with a custom theme 'expert-lawyer-pro' and common plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Cookie Notice. The tech stack includes jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, and Slider Revolution for UI and interactivity. Hosting appears to be provided by Namespace4You based on nameservers. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices. SEO is basic with meta tags and structured navigation but lacks advanced SEO features. Accessibility is basic with room for improvement. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts and lazy loading for images, contributing to performance. No advanced analytics or tracking beyond reCAPTCHA is detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach or limited marketing automation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ceitec.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ceitec.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.