Skip to main content

Security report for ceecatering.com

CEE Catering HoldCo · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CEE Catering HoldCo operates as the managing company of Central Europe's largest workplace hospitality and contract catering group, encompassing subsidiaries such as Delirest, Delirest Services, and Primirest. The company targets corporate clients and institutions across multiple Central European countries, offering services ranging from modern catering solutions to office management and school meals. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to its business audience. Technically, the site is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies including jQuery and CDN hosting via Amazon CloudFront, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS usage implied, but lacks explicit security headers and formal security policies, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, though the presence of multiple subsidiary domains and professional content mitigates this risk. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and suitable for its business purpose but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ceecatering.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CEE Catering HoldCo holds a strong market position as the largest workplace hospitality and contract catering group in Central Europe, serving multiple countries through its subsidiaries. Its business model focuses on B2B services including catering, cleaning, and office management, targeting corporate and institutional clients. The company leverages a multi-brand strategy with Delirest and Primirest catering to different market segments and geographies. The website's linkage to country-specific domains indicates a decentralized operational structure. While revenue streams are not disclosed, the diversified service offerings and geographic reach suggest a stable and scalable business. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main site may indicate a preference for controlled communication channels via contact forms. The company appears to maintain a professional partnership ecosystem with clear corporate governance information, supporting its credibility in the hospitality sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS usage and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of published incident response policies, vulnerability disclosure programs, or security.txt files, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is basic, with privacy and cookie policies present but no active consent mechanisms or GDPR compliance indicators. The absence of contact emails for security or abuse reporting further reduces incident response readiness. Overall, while no immediate vulnerabilities are apparent, the security posture would benefit from implementing best practices and formal policies to align with industry standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Deploy explicit cookie consent banners and privacy compliance mechanisms to meet GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies, including a security.txt file and dedicated security contact channels.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing verified company contact emails and phone numbers for customer and security communications.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update WHOIS registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CEE Catering HoldCo
Description
CEE Catering is Central Europe's largest workplace hospitality and contract catering company group. We are home to Delirest, Delirest Services and Primirest.
Key services
Workplace hospitality, Contract catering, Cleaning services, Office management solutions, School meals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Webflow CMS, SVG images
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS implied by CDN URLs
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
jQuery usage (not analytics but JS library)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact form exists
  3. No visible privacy or cookie consent banners despite policy pages
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, raising some legitimacy questions
  6. Professional design and consistent branding across subsidiaries
  7. Multiple country-specific domains linked as subsidiaries
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing jQuery 3.5.1 and hosted on Amazon CloudFront CDN, which supports good performance and scalability. The site features responsive design with good mobile optimization and accessibility considerations such as focus-visible outlines and text rendering optimizations. SEO is supported through proper meta tags and Open Graph data, enhancing social media sharing and search engine visibility. However, the site lacks advanced frameworks or backend technologies visible from the front-end. Performance is moderate, with multiple optimized images and minimal external dependencies. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and privacy consent mechanisms indicates areas for modernization and compliance improvements. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a corporate website but could be enhanced with stronger security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ceecatering.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ceecatering.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.