Skip to main content

Security report for ccc-graz.at

Steiermärkische Krankenanstaltengesellschaft m.b.H. · Healthcare · Austria

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

87/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Universitäres Comprehensive Cancer Center Graz is a leading healthcare institution specializing in cancer diagnosis, treatment, research, and education in the Steiermark region of Austria. Affiliated with the Steiermärkische Krankenanstaltengesellschaft m.b.H. and the Medical University of Graz, it offers state-of-the-art medical services and fosters interdisciplinary collaboration. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content targeting patients, medical professionals, and research partners. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS, employs Matomo for privacy-conscious analytics, and uses a robust cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, indicating a trustworthy and legitimate entity. No signs of malicious activity or content safety concerns were found. The site effectively balances user experience, privacy, and compliance, making it a reliable resource for its audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ccc-graz.at

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
87

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The cancer center operates within the healthcare sector as a large, essential entity providing specialized oncology services. Its business model focuses on public healthcare delivery combined with academic research and education. The institution benefits from strong partnerships with regional healthcare providers and the Medical University of Graz, enhancing its market position. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on patient care, clinical studies, and professional collaboration. Growth indicators include active event promotion and research dissemination. The partnership ecosystem is robust, with clear links to parent and affiliated organizations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers like Content-Security-Policy suggests room for improvement. The use of Matomo analytics aligns with privacy best practices. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Add incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and cookies to ensure ongoing privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Steiermärkische Krankenanstaltengesellschaft m.b.H.
Description
Das Universitäre Krebszentrum (Comprehensive Cancer Center) Graz betreut Patient*innen auf höchstem Niveau mit modernster Diagnostik und Therapie. Es fördert Forschung, Lehre und interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit im Bereich Krebsbehandlung in der Steiermark.
Key services
Krebsdiagnostik, Krebstherapie, Forschung, Studium & Lehre, Interdisziplinäre Tumorboards
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Matomo Analytics, DataReporter Cookie Consent
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-out and opt-in
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo/Piwik
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo/Piwik
Marketing tools
DataReporter Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong focus on cancer care, research, and education.
  3. Clear cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  5. No phone numbers explicitly labeled as contact found in HTML.
  6. Multiple social media channels linked and active.
  7. Use of Matomo analytics for privacy-friendly tracking.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS, a mature and widely used content management system, indicating a stable technical foundation. It uses Matomo for analytics, favoring privacy over mainstream trackers. The site loads scripts asynchronously and employs lazy loading for images, contributing to moderate performance. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are well implemented. The presence of multiple social media integrations and external links shows a connected digital ecosystem. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were observed, though performance could be further optimized.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ccc-graz.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ccc-graz.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.