Skip to main content

Security report for ccbill.com

CCBill · Finance · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CCBill is a well-established online payment processing company founded in 1998, serving over 30,000 internet businesses globally. The company offers a comprehensive suite of services including payment processing, subscription billing automation, fraud protection, and 24/7 merchant and consumer support. Their market position is strong, supported by industry certifications such as PCI DSS compliance and a BBB A Plus rating. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and targeted content for merchants and consumers alike. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and performance optimizations via WP Rocket, ensuring fast load times and excellent mobile responsiveness. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement, PCI DSS compliance, and use of security best practices, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly detailed. Privacy compliance is addressed through visible privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, leveraging third-party privacy tools like Clym. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, reinforcing the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the company.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ccbill.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CCBill operates in the finance and e-commerce sectors, focusing on online payment solutions for merchants and consumers. Their business model revolves around providing a secure, scalable payment platform with value-added services such as subscription management and fraud protection. The company targets a broad audience including high-risk industries, ecommerce, adult business, and subscription services. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing market presence, comprehensive service offerings, and strong compliance posture. Partnerships with industry associations and integration partners enhance their ecosystem. The website content and structure support lead generation and customer support effectively, indicating mature digital marketing and customer engagement strategies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and PCI DSS compliance prominently displayed. Security best practices such as deferred script loading, CSP violation detection, and privacy SDK integration are implemented. However, the absence of a publicly accessible security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site could improve by publishing a security.txt file and enhancing HTTP security headers. Overall, the security maturity is high but could benefit from increased visibility of security governance and incident response processes.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security frameworks and controls.
  2. Implement and expose a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information for security issues.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Continue monitoring and updating third-party scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CCBill
Description
Trusted for over 20 years, CCBill securely handles transactions globally for online businesses, providing payment processing, subscription management, fraud protection, and 24/7 support.
Key services
Online payment processing, Subscription billing automation, Fraud protection, Merchant and consumer support, Omnichannel payment acceptance
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Bootstrap, WP Rocket (performance optimization), Clym Privacy SDK, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Lazy loading and deferred scripts for performance
  • Use of CSP violation detection in scripts
  • PCI DSS compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Clym Privacy SDK
Marketing tools
LiveChat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Strong focus on online payment processing and merchant services
  3. Comprehensive navigation with clear segmentation for merchants, industries, help, and company info
  4. Multiple trust signals including PCI DSS compliance and BBB rating
  5. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms
  7. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
  8. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and contact forms
  9. Social media presence is active and linked
  10. No visible security policy or incident response contact details
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. Performance is optimized with WP Rocket, including lazy loading of images and deferred JavaScript. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking, alongside Clym for privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting details are not explicit but the site uses multiple preconnects to third-party domains for performance. Technical risks are minimal, with no outdated or vulnerable libraries detected in the provided content. Opportunities exist to further modernize by adopting newer JavaScript frameworks and enhancing accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ccbill.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ccbill.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.