Skip to main content

Security report for cbsi.com

Paramount · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Paramount is a leading global entertainment company specializing in premium content production and streaming services. The website focuses on their streaming business segment, highlighting their reach and content offerings. The company maintains a strong brand presence with consistent branding and professional design. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10 with modern security and performance features including HTTPS, reCAPTCHA, and content security policies. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, reflecting a mature privacy posture. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data reduces domain trustworthiness from a registration perspective. Overall, the site demonstrates a strong security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but could improve transparency by publishing explicit security policies and contact channels.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of cbsi.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cbsi.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Paramount operates in the media sector with a business model centered on content creation and streaming distribution. Their market position is strong as a major global entertainment provider with subsidiaries like Paramount Plus and Pluto TV. The company targets a broad general audience with premium entertainment content. The website's integration with social media and marketing tools indicates an active digital marketing strategy. The lack of direct contact information on this page suggests a focus on brand and service promotion rather than direct customer support here. The partnership ecosystem includes owned streaming platforms, enhancing their market reach and service portfolio.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and security headers such as HSTS, CSP, and X-Frame-Options, indicating a robust security baseline. Use of Google reCAPTCHA helps mitigate automated abuse. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure programs represents a gap in transparency and readiness communication. The site would benefit from clearly defined security contact channels and formalized disclosure processes to enhance trust and incident management capabilities.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and frameworks.
  2. Provide explicit incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Add verified company contact emails and phone numbers for improved business credibility.
  5. Regularly audit WHOIS data to ensure domain registration information is accurate and publicly available.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Paramount
Description
Paramount is one of the world’s leading producers of premium entertainment content that connects billions of people in nearly every country in the world.
Key services
streaming entertainment content, premium content production
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google reCAPTCHA, Ketch, jQuery Mousewheel
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Content Security Policy present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Ketch
Marketing tools
Ketch
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Content is relevant to streaming business of Paramount
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on this page
  4. Social media presence is strong with official accounts linked
  5. Use of modern technologies and security best practices observed
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for a major corporate domain
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present and appear comprehensive
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and services such as Google reCAPTCHA and Ketch for privacy and consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and accessible navigation. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDNs for static assets. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks are minimal, but reliance on third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. The missing WHOIS data is a technical anomaly that should be investigated to ensure domain registration integrity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cbsi.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cbsi.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.