Skip to main content

Security report for cbi.com

CB&I · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CB&I is a globally recognized leader in the design and construction of storage facilities, tanks, and terminals, primarily serving the energy infrastructure sector. With over 135 years of history and more than 60,000 structures completed, the company demonstrates a strong market position and extensive expertise. Their website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence, offering detailed information about their services, product lines, and markets served. The company targets customers involved in complex energy infrastructure projects, emphasizing quality, innovation, and sustainability. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins and frameworks such as GeneratePress, Essential Blocks, and Complianz for GDPR compliance. It employs Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security, respectively. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and implements best practices like reCAPTCHA and cookie consent management. However, explicit security headers are missing, and there is no visible security policy or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The domain registration is privacy protected but consistent with the company's profile and history. Overall, CB&I's website presents a trustworthy and professional image with strong business credibility. To enhance security posture and compliance, the company should consider publishing detailed security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information. These steps would further strengthen user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cbi.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cbi.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
603
Employees
24
Customers
428
Third parties
151
Weak passwords
12%

Latest record dated 2026-05-26 · 50 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for cbi.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –orientation.cbi.com2026-05-26
  • –mymail.cbi.com2026-04-24
  • –mymail.cbi.com2026-03-20
  • –mymail.cbi.com2026-02-08
  • –sts.cbi.com2025-10-31

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CB&I operates in the energy sector, focusing on storage solutions for tanks and terminals. Their business model revolves around engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) services, supported by feasibility studies and inspections. The company leverages a global footprint with 25+ locations and services over 100 countries, indicating a large enterprise scale. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing history, extensive project portfolio, and strategic global operations. The website highlights partnerships and awards, reinforcing market leadership. Revenue streams likely include turnkey EPC contracts, maintenance services, and consulting. Target customers are energy companies and infrastructure developers. The company maintains active social media channels and a dedicated careers subdomain, reflecting organizational growth and engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforcement, use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, and cookie consent management aligned with GDPR. The presence of the Stop User Enumeration plugin indicates attention to common WordPress security risks. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security robustness. No direct contact channels for security incidents or vulnerability disclosures are provided, which could hinder incident response effectiveness. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, the security posture is good but can be improved by implementing additional headers, publishing security policies, and establishing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, HSTS) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Create and make accessible a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance frameworks.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses, to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident handling.
  4. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance transparency by naming a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact to strengthen GDPR compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CB&I
Description
CB&I is the world's leading designer and builder of storage facilities, tanks and terminals. With more than 60,000 structures completed throughout our 135+ year history, we have the global expertise and strategically-located operations to provide customers world-class storage solutions for even the most complex energy infrastructure projects.
Key services
Feasibility Studies, Front-End Engineering Design, Turnkey EPC, Inspections & Repairs
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Swiper.js, WordPress, GeneratePress theme, Essential Blocks plugin, Complianz GDPR plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent management via Complianz plugin
  • Stop User Enumeration plugin active

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content rich
  2. Strong focus on energy infrastructure storage solutions
  3. Comprehensive navigation with detailed submenus
  4. Cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms implemented
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible; contact via form only
  7. Use of modern web technologies and security plugins
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram
  9. WHOIS privacy protection in place but justified for business type
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the GeneratePress theme and several plugins including Essential Blocks and Complianz for GDPR compliance. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. The site is mobile responsive, accessible, and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and resource optimization. The use of stop-user-enumeration plugin indicates proactive security measures. The technical stack is mature and well-maintained, supporting a professional and scalable online presence. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and streamline performance for enhanced user experience and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cbi.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cbi.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.