Skip to main content

Security report for casinos.at

Casinos Austria AG · Hospitality · Austria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Casinos Austria AG operates a comprehensive network of casinos across Austria, providing a wide range of gaming options including poker, slot machines, and table games, complemented by hospitality services such as restaurants and event locations. The website serves as the official digital presence, targeting casino visitors and players with detailed information on locations, events, membership benefits, and promotional packages. The company holds a strong market position as a leading casino operator in Austria, supported by consistent branding and trust indicators such as recognized certifications and responsible gaming initiatives. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS and employs modern web technologies including JavaScript and SVG graphics. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools with user consent mechanisms, ensuring good digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices and clear navigation enhancing user experience. From a security perspective, while the site implements several important security headers and content security policies, it currently lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support modern TLS protocols, significantly weakening its security posture. This exposes the site to risks related to unencrypted traffic and potential interception. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. The presence of a responsible disclosure page indicates a proactive approach to vulnerability management. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but requires urgent improvements in SSL/TLS configuration to secure user data and maintain trust. Strategic recommendations include obtaining a valid SSL certificate, enabling TLS 1.2 or higher, and fully activating HSTS. These steps will enhance security, compliance, and user confidence, supporting the company’s strong market presence and digital strategy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching casinos.at

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
50
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention casinos.at, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
336
Employees
2
Customers
333
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
10%

Latest record dated 2026-06-02 · 5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for casinos.at.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –www.casinos.at2026-06-02
  • –casinos.at2025-09-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Casinos Austria AG is positioned as a dominant player in the Austrian hospitality and gaming sector, operating multiple casino locations nationwide. Their business model combines traditional casino gaming with hospitality and event services, supplemented by membership programs and promotional packages that drive customer engagement and loyalty. The company leverages partnerships with lottery organizations and e-commerce certification bodies to enhance credibility and operational reach. The website reflects a mature digital ecosystem with integrated marketing and analytics tools, supporting targeted campaigns and customer insights. Growth indicators include active event calendars, membership clubs, and a dedicated online shop. The strategic use of social media and responsible gaming initiatives further strengthens brand reputation and market differentiation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with implementation of key HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of TLS protocol support represent critical vulnerabilities that undermine secure communications and expose users to potential data interception. The site uses secure cookie attributes and CSRF tokens in login forms, indicating good practices in session management and input security. The presence of a responsible disclosure page suggests readiness for incident response, though no explicit security policy or incident contact emails were found. Compliance with GDPR is supported by privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues is essential to elevate the security posture and protect sensitive user data.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and protect data in transit.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 or higher protocols and disable insecure protocols to strengthen encryption.
  3. Fully enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to enforce secure connections.
  4. Implement OCSP stapling to improve certificate revocation checking and reduce latency.
  5. Enhance incident response readiness by publishing explicit security policies and dedicated security contact channels.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system, indicating a stable and scalable infrastructure. The tech stack includes modern JavaScript libraries and SVG for graphics, supporting responsive and accessible design. Hosting is provided by Volterra, with CDN usage implied by cloudfront.net references. Performance metrics are moderate, with room for optimization in load times and resource management. SEO is well addressed through meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels are implemented, enhancing usability for diverse users. The site integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, including Google Analytics, Econda, and Jentis, with user consent managed via Usercentrics. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with casinos.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review casinos.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.