Skip to main content

Security report for casablanca.at

CASABLANCA · Hospitality · Austria

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CASABLANCA is a small Austrian company specializing in hotel software solutions aimed at hospitality businesses. Their website presents a modern design built with Nuxt.js and Tailwind CSS, indicating a contemporary technical infrastructure. The site includes a cookie consent mechanism via Usercentrics, reflecting some privacy compliance efforts. However, critical compliance documents such as privacy policy and terms of service are missing, and no direct contact information is provided on the site. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking visible security headers and incident response information. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching casablanca.at

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets the hospitality sector with software products for hotel management and booking operations. Their business model likely revolves around SaaS or licensed software sales. Market positioning appears niche with a focus on hotel operators in Austria or German-speaking regions. The absence of detailed business information and contact data limits deeper business intelligence insights. The use of modern web technologies and integration with Usercentrics and Google Tag Manager suggests an awareness of digital marketing and privacy trends. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent platform, which are positive security indicators. However, the lack of published privacy policy, terms of service, security policy, and incident response contacts represents compliance gaps. No security headers were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analyzed content. The security score is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security documentation, and providing clear contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data handling and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and liabilities.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy including incident response procedures and contacts.
  4. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Provide clear and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CASABLANCA
Description
Provider of hotel software solutions, targeting hospitality businesses to manage their operations efficiently.
Key services
Hotel management software, Booking management, Operational tools for hotels
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Tailwind CSS, Nuxt.js, Usercentrics CMP, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented via Usercentrics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern frontend technologies (Nuxt.js, Tailwind CSS).
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Usercentrics CMP.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  6. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. WHOIS data is consistent and supports business legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Nuxt.js, a modern Vue.js framework, and styled with Tailwind CSS, indicating a modern and maintainable frontend architecture. The presence of Usercentrics CMP and Google Tag Manager shows integration with privacy and analytics tools. Performance appears moderate with no explicit data on loading times. Mobile optimization is good given the responsive design implied by Tailwind CSS usage. Accessibility and SEO are basic but could be enhanced with more semantic markup and metadata. Hosting provider and backend technologies are not identified from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 51/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with casablanca.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review casablanca.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.