Skip to main content

Security report for carbonfuture.earth

Carbonfuture · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Carbonfuture is a technology-driven company specializing in providing digital infrastructure for durable carbon removal. Their flagship product, Carbonfuture MRV+, offers an integrated solution for monitoring, reporting, and verification of carbon removal projects, supporting the entire lifecycle from project due diligence to third-party certification. The company targets both suppliers of carbon removal projects and buyers seeking high-quality carbon credits, positioning itself as a trusted partner with notable clients such as Microsoft and Swiss Re. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and Lottie animations, delivering a professional and responsive user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers and explicit privacy policies are missing. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection which is justified for this business type but reduces transparency. Overall, Carbonfuture presents a credible and professional digital presence with room for improvement in privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching carbonfuture.earth

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Carbonfuture operates in the energy and technology sectors, focusing on carbon removal markets. Their business model revolves around providing a platform and services that streamline certification, monitoring, and market access for carbon removal projects. They maintain a global supplier network and cater to buyers looking for de-risked carbon credit portfolios. The company leverages partnerships with industry leaders and climate pioneers to strengthen market position and trust. Revenue streams likely include platform subscriptions, certification facilitation fees, and data services. The website content and testimonials indicate a mature partnership ecosystem and a strategic focus on transparency and trust in carbon markets.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, reflecting awareness of privacy compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of WHOIS transparency is mitigated by the professional nature of the site and trusted partnerships. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by publishing security policies and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages linked prominently on the website.
  2. Add and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve transparency and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities and update them accordingly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Carbonfuture
Description
Carbonfuture builds trust throughout the carbon removal journey with a rigorous, data-driven approach, ensuring unmatched quality and reliability of carbon removal. Their core product, Carbonfuture MRV+, is a fully integrated, end-to-end solution for monitoring, reporting, and verification of carbon removal projects, supporting the entire lifecycle from project support and due diligence to third-party verification and certification. They serve suppliers seeking certification and market access and buyers looking for de-risked portfolios of high-quality carbon credits.
Key services
Carbon removal supplier services, Due diligence, Carbon removal tracking, Third-party verification and certification enablement, Market access facilitation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Webflow CMS, Google Fonts (Montserrat), Lottie animations, Plausible Analytics, Finsweet Cookie Consent, Digital Sparks Cookie Consent Boost
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of third-party cookie consent tools
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage HTML
  3. Cookie consent implemented with opt-in mechanism
  4. No visible privacy policy or terms of service pages linked in header or footer
  5. Strong branding and consistent messaging about carbon removal services
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information
  8. No explicit security or incident response contact information
  9. WHOIS data is missing, indicating privacy protection
  10. Multiple trusted partner logos and testimonials present
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and hosting, leveraging modern front-end technologies such as Google Fonts, Lottie animations, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and professional design quality. Performance is moderate, typical for CMS-based sites with rich media content. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical infrastructure supports a seamless user experience but could benefit from enhanced security header implementation and more explicit privacy and security disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with carbonfuture.earth. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review carbonfuture.earth.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.