Skip to main content

Security report for carbonfuture.com

Carbonfuture · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Carbonfuture is a digital infrastructure company specializing in durable carbon removal solutions. Their flagship product, Carbonfuture MRV+, offers an integrated platform for monitoring, reporting, verification, and certification of carbon removal projects globally. The company targets both suppliers of carbon removal projects and buyers seeking high-quality carbon credits, positioning itself as a trusted partner to industry leaders such as Microsoft and Swiss Re. Technically, the website is built on modern Webflow CMS with strong SEO, mobile optimization, and performance characteristics. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. The lack of WHOIS domain registration data is a concern for domain legitimacy, but the professional content and partnerships mitigate this risk. Overall, Carbonfuture presents a credible and professional digital presence in the carbon removal market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching carbonfuture.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention carbonfuture.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for carbonfuture.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Carbonfuture operates in the energy sector focusing on carbon removal technologies including Biochar, BECCS, DACCS, and Mineralization. Their business model revolves around providing a digital platform that streamlines certification and market access for suppliers while offering buyers de-risked portfolios of carbon credits. The company has established strategic partnerships with major climate pioneers and maintains a global supplier network. Their revenue streams likely include platform fees, certification facilitation, and carbon credit transactions. The company demonstrates growth potential through technology innovation and trusted market positioning. However, the absence of direct contact details and domain registration transparency suggests areas for operational improvement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements key security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, indicating a mature security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and preparedness. No dedicated security contact channels were found. Compliance with GDPR is indicated through privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance and incident response communications.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Add direct company contact emails and phone numbers for sales and support to enhance business credibility.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying recognized security certifications such as ISO 27001 or NIST compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Carbonfuture
Description
Carbonfuture provides digital infrastructure for durable carbon removal, offering a rigorous, data-driven approach to ensure quality and reliability of carbon removal credits. Their core product, Carbonfuture MRV+, supports the entire carbon removal lifecycle including monitoring, reporting, verification, due diligence, third-party certification, and market access. They serve suppliers and buyers globally, with a supplier network spanning five continents and multiple carbon removal technologies.
Key services
Carbon removal supplier services, Due diligence, Carbon removal tracking, Third-party verification & certification enablement, Market access for carbon credits
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Webflow CMS, Google Fonts (Montserrat), Lottie animations, JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP and other security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure external scripts loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong focus on carbon removal digital infrastructure and market facilitation.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and good SEO practices.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via forms only.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, domain registration details missing, which is a concern.
  7. Privacy and cookie policies present with consent mechanisms.
  8. Multiple trusted partners and testimonials enhance credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, and Lottie animations to deliver a modern, responsive, and visually appealing user experience. Performance is fast with optimized images and asynchronous script loading. SEO is well addressed with comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is good with semantic HTML and keyboard navigation support. Hosting is via Webflow, a reputable provider. Technical risks are minimal, but reliance on third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Opportunities exist to enhance technical documentation and security automation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with carbonfuture.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review carbonfuture.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.