Skip to main content

Security report for capitalhotel.co.uk

Warwick Hotels and Resorts · Hospitality · United Kingdom

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Capital Hotel, Apartments & Townhouse is a luxury boutique hotel located in Knightsbridge, London, operated under the Warwick Hotels and Resorts brand. The website presents a comprehensive offering of accommodations, dining, events, and wellness services targeting upscale travelers and tourists. The site is professionally designed with clear navigation and integrates modern booking and analytics technologies, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and consent management, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly detailed. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust slightly but does not detract from the overall legitimacy given the brand association and professional web presence. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and continuous monitoring of third-party scripts.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching capitalhotel.co.uk

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Warwick Hotels and Resorts positions The Capital Hotel as a premium hospitality provider in a competitive London market. The business model focuses on luxury accommodation and personalized guest experiences, leveraging partnerships with booking platforms and marketing tools to drive direct bookings. The website's integration with social media and targeted offers indicates a customer-centric approach. Growth potential is supported by a strong brand and diversified service offerings including apartments and event spaces. The partnership ecosystem includes TravelClick for booking and SK Chase for e-gift services, enhancing operational capabilities. The company maintains a consistent brand image and high content quality, reinforcing market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS, secure form practices, and cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS is a gap that could be addressed to mitigate risks like clickjacking and cross-site scripting. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published incident response or security policy page limits transparency and preparedness perception. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from formalized documentation and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to prevent supply chain vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance form security by adding anti-CSRF tokens and validating inputs server-side.
  5. Maintain and communicate clear data retention and privacy policies to strengthen GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Warwick Hotels and Resorts
Description
A 5-Star Boutique Hotel, Apartment & Townhouse, located in the heart of Knightsbridge, close by world-class shopping: Harrods, Harvey Nichols & Sloane Street.
Key services
Hotel rooms and suites, Apartments and townhouses, Dining and bar services, Meetings and events facilities, Wellness area
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Triptease, SecurePrivacy, Pikaday (date picker), Swiper.js (slider), Fancybox (lightbox), Google Maps API
Platforms
TravelClick Web Solutions
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with autocomplete off
  • Consent management via SecurePrivacy

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Triptease, TCGMS abandonment tracking
Marketing tools
Triptease, SecurePrivacy
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a luxury boutique hotel site for The Capital Hotel in London.
  2. Content is rich with detailed navigation and multiple service offerings.
  3. Strong integration with booking engine and third-party analytics.
  4. No signs of malware or phishing.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy or domain registration issues.
  6. Good privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanisms.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  9. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Triptease, and SecurePrivacy for analytics and consent management. The CMS is TravelClick, a specialized hospitality platform, indicating a tailored solution for hotel operations. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site employs advanced UI components like Swiper.js sliders and Fancybox lightboxes, enhancing user experience. Hosting details are not explicit but integration with TravelClick suggests specialized hosting. Technical debt appears low with clean HTML and CSS, though opportunities exist to optimize loading times and implement progressive web app features for further modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with capitalhotel.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review capitalhotel.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.