Skip to main content

Security report for camutronics.com

Cambridge Microelectronics Ltd. · Energy · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cambridge Microelectronics Ltd. (Camutronics) is a specialized fabless semiconductor company focused on power device technologies, including silicon and wide bandgap semiconductors. The company offers design, simulation, testing, and consultancy services primarily targeting energy-saving power electronics applications. Their market position is that of a niche technology provider and a Cambridge University spin-out, serving clients requiring advanced semiconductor device development. The website content is professional and well-structured, reflecting a small but technically competent business. Technically, the website uses standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without any detected CMS or advanced frameworks. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO practices but lacks advanced analytics or tracking tools. No security headers or SSL configuration details were available, and no forms or user input fields are present, which reduces attack surface but also limits user engagement. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, and no contact emails or incident response channels are provided. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional appearance of the website. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site content is safe with no adult or questionable material. Overall, the site presents a credible business front but requires improvements in transparency, security policies, and domain registration clarity to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching camutronics.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy sector with a focus on semiconductor technology for power devices. Their business model is fabless semiconductor design and consultancy, targeting R&D and manufacturing clients needing custom device solutions. The company leverages its Cambridge University spin-out status as a trust signal. The absence of contact emails and WHOIS data limits direct engagement and raises questions about domain ownership. The website's lack of analytics and advertising suggests a low marketing footprint, focusing on direct client relationships. Growth indicators and partnerships are not evident from the site, indicating a small, specialized operation.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic. The absence of HTTPS confirmation and security headers is a concern. No privacy or cookie policies are published, and no incident response contacts are provided. The lack of forms reduces attack vectors but also limits user interaction. The missing WHOIS data is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security certifications. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing standard security best practices, publishing compliance documents, and clarifying domain registration to improve trust and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and verify configuration.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add clear contact emails including security and abuse addresses for incident response.
  4. Obtain and display domain registration details to improve legitimacy and trust.
  5. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Cambridge Microelectronics Ltd.
Registration number
08096560
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cambridge Microelectronics Ltd.
Description
A fabless semiconductor company specialising in power device design, product development, and IP creation with expertise in silicon, wide bandgap, and ultra-wide bandgap technologies. Offers device design, TCAD simulations, package design support, testing, and consultancy services from concept to manufacturing.
Key services
Power device design and development, TCAD simulations, Custom device layouts, Package design support, Electrical testing, Consultancy services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No forms detected to collect user input
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided; only physical address in footer.
  4. No forms or user input fields detected, reducing attack surface.
  5. No external links or social media profiles found in the HTML content.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. WHOIS data missing or domain unregistered, which is unusual and suspicious.
  8. Website design is professional and mobile responsive.
  9. No security headers or SSL info available from provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with clean, modern HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with responsive design for mobile devices. No CMS or third-party frameworks detected, indicating a custom or lightweight build. Performance is moderate with no heavy scripts or external dependencies. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured content but lacks advanced structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. The absence of security headers and SSL info suggests potential technical debt in security configuration. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with modern security and analytics features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with camutronics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review camutronics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.