Skip to main content

Security report for campingsdecharme.fr

ACSI · Hospitality · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ACSI operates a well-established European camping information and booking platform, focusing on small charming campsites across Europe. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates modern technologies such as React, Google Tag Manager, and New Relic for performance monitoring. The business has a strong market position with multiple related brands and services, including CampingCard ACSI and a webshop. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement, reCAPTCHA integration, and security best practices, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. Privacy compliance is good with visible cookie consent and privacy policy in French. However, the lack of WHOIS data for the domain introduces some uncertainty regarding domain legitimacy and registration history. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency in security and domain registration details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching campingsdecharme.fr

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
25
Email security
40
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets camping enthusiasts in Europe, offering detailed campsite inspections, discount cards, and booking services. Its business model combines information services with product sales and memberships. The presence of multiple related domains and services indicates a mature ecosystem. The website content is relevant and well-structured, supporting user engagement and conversions. The company has a medium-sized footprint in the hospitality sector, with a history dating back to 1965, although domain age cannot be verified. Partnerships with related camping sites and services strengthen its market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA v3, and New Relic monitoring. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness perception. The domain WHOIS data is missing, which is a potential risk factor. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by publishing explicit policies and contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ACSI
Description
ACSI is a specialist in camping in Europe since 1965, offering information and booking services for small charming campsites across Europe. The site promotes over 2000 inspected campsites annually and provides related services such as CampingCard ACSI and a webshop.
Key services
Camping site information and inspection reports, CampingCard discount card, Booking services, Webshop for camping products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (implied by react-search feature), Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Convert Experiences, jVectorMap, New Relic Browser monitoring
Frameworks
React
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 integration
  • Use of security origin trials
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of New Relic for monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, New Relic Browser
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Convert Experiences
Marketing tools
Convert Experiences, New Relic
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in French targeting European camping enthusiasts.
  3. Multiple related ACSI brand sites linked and promoted.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. Good privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanism.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response info found.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with React components and integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, advertising, and user interaction. Performance is optimized with preloading of fonts and images, and mobile responsiveness is well implemented. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles are present. The CMS appears custom-built, with no common CMS detected. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. The technical infrastructure supports a fast and user-friendly experience but should maintain vigilance on third-party script security and domain registration transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with campingsdecharme.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review campingsdecharme.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.