Skip to main content

Security report for campings.nl

Campings.nl · Hospitality · Netherlands

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Campings.nl is a Dutch-language online platform specializing in camping search and booking services across Europe, covering over 30 countries. It offers users the ability to search by destination, theme, or map, with direct booking options and user reviews, positioning itself as a leading camping search engine in the Netherlands. The website demonstrates a good level of digital maturity with modern JavaScript usage, SVG maps, and integration of analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity. However, explicit privacy and cookie policies are not found in the provided content, which may impact compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and some security best practices observed, but lacks visible security headers and has an empty CSRF token meta tag, indicating room for improvement. Overall, the platform appears professional and trustworthy with a safe content rating, but should enhance privacy compliance and security measures to strengthen its position.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching campings.nl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, targeting camping enthusiasts primarily in the Dutch market. Its business model revolves around providing a comprehensive camping search engine with direct booking capabilities and user-generated reviews, which likely generates revenue through bookings and advertising. The platform's extensive coverage of European countries and emphasis on honest reviews serve as competitive advantages. The lack of visible contact information and privacy policies in the analyzed content suggests potential areas for operational transparency improvement. The use of multiple tracking and analytics services indicates a focus on marketing and user behavior analysis, supporting growth and optimization efforts.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and asynchronous loading of analytics scripts, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces its defense-in-depth. The empty CSRF token meta tag may indicate incomplete implementation of CSRF protections. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is present, which limits transparency in security incident handling. The use of third-party scripts requires ongoing review to mitigate privacy and security risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced header configurations, proper CSRF token usage, and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Ensure CSRF tokens are properly generated, populated, and validated to protect against cross-site request forgery.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts and data protection officer details.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Campings.nl
Description
Bekijk ons uitgebreide aanbod en zoek op bestemming, thema of op de kaart ✅ +30 landen ✅ Eerlijke reviews ✅ De camping zoekmachine van Nederland!
Key services
Camping search by destination, theme, or map, Direct booking, User reviews, Wishlist and saved accommodations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, SVG, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, WCT (Web Call Tracker)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • CSRF token meta tag present (though empty)
  • Async loading of analytics and tracking scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, WCT
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional camping search and booking platform targeting Dutch users
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found in provided content
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML snippet
  4. Extensive use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts
  5. Good SEO and metadata usage including Open Graph and Twitter cards
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  8. No data protection officer contact found
  9. Content is safe and family-friendly
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern web technologies including JavaScript, SVG for interactive maps, and integrates multiple analytics and tracking services. The presence of Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity indicates a mature approach to user behavior analysis. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous script loading improving load times. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and incomplete security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with campings.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review campings.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.