Skip to main content

Security report for calcolosi-urinaria.it

C.L.U. Club Italiano di Litiasi Urinaria · Healthcare · Italy

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.calcolosi-urinaria.it represents the Club Italiano di Litiasi Urinaria (C.L.U.), an Italian non-profit medical association dedicated to the study, prevention, and treatment of urinary stone disease. The site provides information about the association, upcoming congresses, scientific articles, newsletters, and a reserved member area. The target audience primarily includes medical professionals and researchers interested in urology and urinary lithiasis. The business model is focused on education, event organization, and member services within the healthcare sector in Italy. Technically, the website is built on a custom ASP.NET platform with modern front-end technologies such as Bootstrap, Google Fonts, and Swiper.js for interactive sliders. The site is mobile-optimized and offers a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. However, some technical aspects such as accessibility and SEO could be improved. No major performance issues were detected, but hosting details and SSL configuration specifics are not available. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has basic form validation but lacks important security headers like Content-Security-Policy and HSTS. There are no visible privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance concern under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The site does not appear to use tracking or analytics services, which reduces privacy risks but also limits marketing insights. Overall, the website is a credible and professional platform for a specialized medical association but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching calcolosi-urinaria.it

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

C.L.U. holds a niche position as a specialized Italian medical association focused on urinary lithiasis. Its competitive advantage lies in its dedicated congresses, scientific publications, and member services. The association operates as a non-profit entity, relying on event organization and membership fees. The target customers are healthcare professionals and researchers in urology. The partnership with entities like Rocchetta and the International Alliance for Urolithiasis indicates a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators include regular congresses and educational projects. The website supports these activities but lacks advanced digital marketing or analytics capabilities.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate but with notable gaps. HTTPS is used, but no security headers are detected, which exposes the site to potential clickjacking, XSS, and other attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a significant compliance gap under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, limiting the organization's ability to manage security incidents effectively. Form inputs have basic validation, but no advanced protections like CAPTCHA or multi-factor authentication are evident. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing standard security headers, publishing privacy documentation, and establishing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response process and contact channels for security issues.
  4. Improve accessibility features and SEO optimization for better user experience and reach.
  5. Consider integrating analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to gain insights while maintaining user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
C.L.U. Club Italiano di Litiasi Urinaria
Description
C.L.U. is an Italian urological association focused on urinary stone disease (calcolosi urinaria). It organizes congresses, educational projects, and campaigns for prevention and treatment of urinary lithiasis. The association provides scientific articles, newsletters, and member services.
Key services
Organization of congresses and events, Publication of scientific articles, Member area with personal data management, Newsletter distribution, Educational projects and campaigns
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap CSS, Google Fonts, Swiper.js slider, HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (assumed from URL)
  • Form validation with constraints (numeric for phone input)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional association site focused on urinary stone disease in Italy.
  2. Content is in Italian with some English elements.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in footer and modal form.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Site uses modern front-end technologies but lacks advanced security headers.
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom ASP.NET backend with front-end technologies including Bootstrap, Google Fonts, and Swiper.js. The design is professional and mobile-friendly, with interactive sliders and clear navigation. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or modern frameworks like React or Angular. Performance is moderate, with no obvious blocking scripts or heavy resources. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and SEO optimizations such as meta descriptions or structured data. Security headers are missing, and no analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal technical debt but also limited digital marketing maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with calcolosi-urinaria.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review calcolosi-urinaria.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.