Skip to main content

Security report for cakirs.cz

Cakir's Burger · Hospitality · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cakir's Burger is a small local burger restaurant based in Šumperk, Czech Republic, offering a variety of burgers and related menu items through an online e-shop and mobile application. The business focuses on providing diverse burger options including single, double, and triple burgers, along with sides and drinks, targeting general consumers seeking convenient food delivery and takeaway services. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, supporting online ordering and customer engagement features such as order tracking and bonus systems. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including service workers and integrates external APIs like OpenStreetMap for geolocation services. However, the absence of WHOIS data and lack of visible security headers or explicit privacy and cookie policies indicate areas for improvement in transparency and compliance. The security posture is moderate with room for enhancement in SSL configuration and security best practices. Overall, the website presents a functional and user-friendly platform for its business model but should address privacy and security gaps to strengthen trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cakirs.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector with a focus on e-commerce food delivery. Its competitive advantage lies in a comprehensive menu with multiple burger variants and an integrated online ordering system accessible via web and mobile app. The target market is local consumers in Šumperk and surrounding areas. The business model is direct-to-consumer with digital ordering and delivery logistics. The presence of bonus and order tracking systems suggests customer retention strategies. Partnerships appear limited to platform providers like objedname.eu. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital marketing and expanded delivery zones. The lack of detailed company registration or VAT information limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. It uses HTTPS (implied by URLs) and registers a service worker for offline capabilities, indicating some modern security awareness. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, which are critical for GDPR compliance. The absence of contact information for incident response or security policy further weakens the security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. The use of Facebook Pixel without a consent mechanism is a compliance risk. Overall, the site should implement security headers, privacy notices, and incident response contacts to improve its security and compliance standing.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear contact information for security incidents and designate an incident response channel.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration details to improve transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and libraries, including tracking pixels, to minimize vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cakir's Burger
Description
Nejlepší burgery ze Šumperka. Rozvážíme burgery všeho druhu. Single, Double, triple, slider, prostě všechno, na co si vzpomenete i nevzpomenete. Objednávejte online přes e-shop nebo přes mobilní aplikaci.
Key services
Burger sales, Online ordering via e-shop, Mobile application ordering, Delivery service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3, Service Worker, OpenStreetMap API
Platforms
Web, Mobile app integration
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Service worker registered for offline support

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a local burger restaurant e-commerce platform with online ordering and delivery.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Site uses Facebook Pixel for tracking but lacks cookie consent mechanism.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Site uses service workers indicating some level of modern web technology adoption.
  7. Menu and product listings are detailed and well structured.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL status unknown.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with service workers for offline support and integrates external APIs like OpenStreetMap for geolocation. The menu and e-commerce functionalities are well structured with dynamic filtering and sorting options. However, no CMS or backend technology is explicitly detected. Performance appears moderate with large image assets and multiple scripts. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport settings. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cakirs.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cakirs.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.