Skip to main content

Security report for cactusburito.com

Burrito, taco and quesadilla. · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Burrito, taco and quesadilla.' represents a small hospitality business specializing in Mexican fast food offerings such as burritos, tacos, quesadillas, and nachos, located in Riga, Latvia. The business targets local customers seeking authentic Mexican cuisine and caters to daily meals and events. The site is hosted on WordPress.com and uses standard WordPress technologies including Jetpack and Gutenberg blocks, with Apple MapKit integration for location display. The digital infrastructure is moderate in performance and mobile optimized, but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks security headers and formal incident response contacts. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cactusburito.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector with a focus on Mexican cuisine in the Riga market. It leverages a direct food service model with on-site sales and event catering. The website content and imagery support a consistent brand identity. The presence of a Facebook profile indicates some social media engagement. The business appears small in scale with no evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies. Revenue streams likely derive from direct food sales and catering services. The lack of detailed contact information and policies suggests a lean operational model with limited digital maturity. There are no indications of partnerships or complex business ecosystems.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure mechanism further reduces security maturity. The use of WordPress.com hosting and Jetpack plugin provides some inherent security benefits, but the site would benefit from additional security hardening and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  4. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve site visibility and user experience.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Burrito, taco and quesadilla.
Description
A hospitality business offering Mexican fast food including burritos, tacos, quesadillas, and nachos. Located in Riga, Latvia, serving meals on-site at I/C “Olimpija”, Āzenes iela 5, second floor.
Key services
Burritos, Tacos, Quesadillas, Nachos, Event catering
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Jetpack, Gutenberg, Apple MapKit, Gravatar, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
WordPress block editor
Platforms
WordPress.com hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of WordPress security plugins (Jetpack)

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WordPress.com Stats
Marketing tools
Jetpack, WordPress.com subscription forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress.com hosted site focused on Mexican fast food in Riga, Latvia.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information limited to physical address and subscription form; no phone or email explicitly provided.
  4. No security.txt or incident response contacts found.
  5. Uses HTTPS with no visible security headers.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  7. Social media presence limited to a Facebook profile link.
  8. No advertising networks detected beyond WordPress.com stats tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Gutenberg block editor and hosted on WordPress.com infrastructure. It uses Jetpack for additional functionality and Apple MapKit for map integration. The site loads CSS and JavaScript resources from WordPress.com CDN and other trusted sources. Performance is moderate with responsive design for mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic, with some skip links and semantic HTML usage. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no structured JSON-LD data. The site does not use advanced analytics beyond WordPress.com stats. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cactusburito.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cactusburito.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.