Skip to main content

Security report for c-lockinc.com

C-Lock Inc. · Energy · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

C-Lock Inc. is a specialized company focused on providing precision agricultural technology solutions, particularly in measuring and controlling cattle feed intake and emissions. Their offerings include automated emissions measurement and individual animal feed intake control, targeting agricultural researchers, livestock producers, and environmental scientists. The company positions itself as a niche provider in the energy and agriculture sectors with a small business size and founding year around 2019. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, supporting a positive user experience. Technically, the website leverages modern tools such as Craft CMS, Google Tag Manager, StatCounter, and Twitter tracking pixels. It demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. The site uses HTTPS with secure form handling and cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a solid security posture. However, explicit security headers and incident response policies are absent, representing areas for improvement. From a security perspective, the site shows no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent. The lack of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern, as it creates uncertainty about domain legitimacy despite the professional web presence. This discrepancy lowers the overall trust score but does not negate the business's apparent legitimacy. Overall, C-Lock Inc. presents a credible and professional online presence with good technical and security foundations. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response information, and resolving WHOIS registration transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching c-lockinc.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

C-Lock Inc. operates in a specialized niche within the agricultural and energy sectors, focusing on precision livestock management and emissions monitoring. Their business model is B2B, providing hardware and software solutions to improve efficiency and environmental impact in cattle farming. The company leverages digital marketing and social media to engage with its target audience, including researchers and producers. The presence of multiple social media channels and a comprehensive website indicates active market engagement. The lack of WHOIS data is a potential risk factor but may be due to privacy protection or domain registration issues. The company appears to be small-sized with a focused product offering and a clear value proposition centered on sustainability and precision agriculture.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, CSRF protection on forms, and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces the overall security hardening. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts is moderate and managed with user consent. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The missing WHOIS data introduces a trust concern that should be addressed to improve domain legitimacy and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  2. Create and make publicly available an incident response and security policy page to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues arise.
  5. Enhance user trust by adding terms of service and vulnerability disclosure policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
C-Lock Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
C-Lock Inc.
Description
C-Lock Inc. focuses on smart agricultural practices & energy production with automated emissions measurement & individual animal feed intake control.
Key services
Automated emissions measurement, Individual animal feed intake control, Performance evaluation solutions, Emission monitoring solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, StatCounter, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Craft CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token usage in forms
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
StatCounter, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
StatCounter, Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Twitter Pixel, Google Analytics (implied by _ga cookie)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to precision agriculture and emissions monitoring.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms.
  4. WHOIS data is missing or domain is not found in the registry, which is suspicious.
  5. Multiple social media profiles linked and active.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools with moderate user tracking.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Craft CMS as its content management system, supported by modern JavaScript libraries and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Performance is moderate with video backgrounds and responsive images optimized for various screen sizes. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels are present, contributing to a good user experience. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter card metadata. The site is mobile optimized and uses lazy loading for images. There is no indication of legacy or vulnerable libraries. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for security header enhancements and domain registration transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with c-lockinc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review c-lockinc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.