Skip to main content

Security report for bybit.nl

Bybit EU GmbH · Finance · Netherlands

Partial score · DNS & email only

49/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bybit EU GmbH operates a professional cryptocurrency exchange platform targeting European users, offering spot and futures trading, staking, NFT marketplace, and copy trading services. The platform is licensed under MiCAR and supervised by the Austrian Financial Markets Authority, reflecting strong regulatory compliance. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure built on React and Next.js, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement, cold wallet asset protection, and real-time risk monitoring, although incident response contact details and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly visible. Overall, the platform presents a trustworthy and professional service with room for improvement in privacy compliance and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bybit.nl

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
49

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bybit holds a strong market position as a licensed crypto exchange with over 10 million users and a broad product suite. Its partnership with SATOS for fiat deposits and presence in Kazakhstan as a subsidiary indicate a growing ecosystem. The business model focuses on trading fees, staking yields, and value-added services like copy trading and NFTs. The target audience is crypto traders and investors in the European Economic Area, supported by localized Dutch content and payment methods like SEPA and iDEAL. The company leverages community engagement and regulatory adherence as competitive advantages.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements key security headers, ensuring secure communication and protection against common web attacks. Asset protection is emphasized through cold wallet storage and continuous real-time monitoring of user behavior. However, the absence of a public vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contacts limits transparency. The platform encourages enhanced account security via two-factor authentication and anti-phishing codes. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with EU privacy regulations.
  2. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Expand security certifications and trust badges on the website to reinforce user confidence.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bybit EU GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bybit EU GmbH
Description
Cryptohandelservaring op een hoger niveau. Koop, verkoop, verhandel BTC, altcoins en NFT's. Krijg toegang tot de spot- en futuresmarkt of stake je munten op een veilige manier.
Key services
Spot trading, Futures trading, Staking, NFT marketplace, Copy trading, Crypto purchase via SEPA and iDEAL
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React 18.2.0, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS Modules, Webpack
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cold wallet asset protection
  • Real-time risk monitoring
  • Two-factor authentication recommended

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professional and targeted at European crypto traders
  3. Strong regulatory compliance signals present
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  5. No visible cookie consent banner detected
  6. Good use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  7. Security best practices are stated but incident response info is lacking
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React and Next.js stack with modular CSS and Webpack bundling, supporting good performance and mobile responsiveness. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and localized content. Analytics are implemented via Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics, enabling moderate user tracking. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed but the site loads efficiently with asynchronous scripts and preloading strategies. There is no detected CMS, indicating a custom or headless architecture. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and cookie management for better compliance and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bybit.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bybit.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.