Skip to main content

Security report for bvpa.org

Bundesverband professioneller Bildanbieter e.V. · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Bundesverband professioneller Bildanbieter e.V. (BVPA) is a well-established non-profit association founded in 1970, representing professional image providers and related service companies primarily in Germany and Europe. The organization offers key services including interest representation, legal advice, networking events, publications on image usage fees, and training seminars. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence targeting industry professionals and stakeholders in the media and photography sectors. Technically, the site is built on a modern WordPress platform with WooCommerce and CherryFramework, hosted likely by IONOS SE, and demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, though improvements are recommended in DNSSEC deployment and security headers. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but lacking a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, indicating a trustworthy and legitimate online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bvpa.org

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bvpa.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bvpa.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BVPA holds a leading market position as a trade association for professional image providers, offering a comprehensive suite of services that support its members' legal, networking, and educational needs. Its business model is non-profit and membership-driven, focusing on advocacy and industry standards. The organization maintains partnerships such as with pictaday.org, enhancing its event and community engagement. The website content and structure support clear communication of its mission and services, targeting professional users in the media and photography industries. Growth indicators include active event promotion and publication sales. The association's transparent contact information and published resources contribute to its credibility and member trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents areas for improvement. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder rapid mitigation of security issues. The use of up-to-date WordPress and plugins is positive, but continuous monitoring and security hardening are advised. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the organization's risk profile but could benefit from enhanced DNS and HTTP security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure page (e.g., security.txt) to improve incident response readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update all WordPress components and monitor for security advisories to maintain a strong security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bundesverband professioneller Bildanbieter e.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bundesverband professioneller Bildanbieter e.V.
Description
Der Bundesverband professioneller Bildanbieter (BVPA) wurde 1970 in Berlin als Interessenvertretung für deutsche Pressebild-Agenturen und Bildarchive gegründet. Heute ist der BVPA führende Instanz in Deutschland und dem europäischen Raum für alle Fragen rund um visuelle Inhalte und vertritt kleine und große Bildanbieter in ganz Europa. Der Verband repräsentiert außerdem die Interessen von Unternehmen, die bildagenturnahe Services anbieten, z.B. technische und juristische Dienstleistungen wie Keywording, Rechteverfolgung und Digital Asset Management.
Key services
Interest representation, Legal advice, Networking events, Publications on image usage fees, Job board, Training and seminars
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.9.12, WooCommerce 7.1.0, jQuery, Bootstrap, CherryFramework theme, PHP (implied by WordPress), Google Maps API
Frameworks
CherryFramework, Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern WordPress and plugins

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO plugin, WooCommerce
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional association for image providers in Germany and Europe.
  2. Content is in German language and well structured.
  3. No signs of malicious or phishing content.
  4. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR relevance.
  5. Use of standard WordPress plugins and themes.
  6. Presence of external links to social media and partner sites.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  8. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and CherryFramework theme, leveraging Bootstrap and jQuery libraries. The site uses Google Maps API and fonts.googleapis.com for enhanced UI/UX. Performance is moderate with standard optimization techniques like lazy loading and caching (WP Rocket). Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting appears to be with IONOS SE, a reputable provider. The technical stack is modern but would benefit from additional security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bvpa.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bvpa.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.