Skip to main content

Security report for burnsnotice.com

Burns Notice · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Burns Notice is an independent journalism website run by Katelyn Burns, focusing on trans rights, politics, internet culture, gaming, and occasional sports commentary. The site operates primarily as a newsletter subscription platform with additional podcast content, targeting a general audience interested in progressive political commentary. The website is built on the Ghost CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and integrations with Stripe for payment processing and Art19 for podcast delivery. The site demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and uses secure form inputs but lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are published, which impacts compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency, although the website content and branding appear professional and consistent. Overall, the site presents a moderate security posture with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices. The lack of direct contact information and incident response details limits trust signals. Strategic recommendations include publishing privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, and clarifying domain registration status to enhance credibility and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching burnsnotice.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Burns Notice operates as a niche independent media outlet focusing on social justice and political commentary, primarily through newsletter subscriptions and podcast content. The business model relies on paid memberships and audience engagement via digital content. The market position is that of a small, independent journalist with a dedicated but limited audience. The use of Ghost CMS and Stripe indicates a modern, scalable digital infrastructure. The absence of extensive partner or subsidiary domains suggests a standalone operation. Growth indicators include active content updates and integration of membership features. The lack of explicit business contact details and privacy policies may limit broader market trust and partnership opportunities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and form inputs appear secure. However, the absence of key security headers reduces protection against common web attacks such as clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not present, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. The lack of WHOIS data transparency is a notable risk factor. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small independent media site but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and abuse reporting to enhance trust and incident response readiness.
  4. Verify and disclose domain registration details to improve legitimacy and transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Burns Notice
Description
Trans rights, politics internet culture, gaming, and the occasional sports thing. A newsletter by independent journalist Katelyn Burns.
Key services
news commentary, newsletter subscription, podcast content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Ghost CMS, JavaScript, CSS, Stripe (payment processing), Art19 (podcast player), Sodo Search, Webmentions
Frameworks
Ghost
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • secure form inputs
  • no exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Ghost Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Ghost Members, Stripe
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional independent journalism platform focused on trans rights and politics.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers provided on the site.
  4. Uses modern CMS (Ghost) and integrates payment via Stripe.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enforced.
  6. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Ghost CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as JavaScript, CSS, and web fonts. It integrates third-party services including Stripe for payment processing, Art19 for podcast streaming, and Sodo Search for site search functionality. The site uses webmentions and member management scripts indicating a community engagement focus. Performance is moderate with preloading of critical assets and responsive design. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. However, the absence of security headers and limited accessibility features suggest areas for technical improvement. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with burnsnotice.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review burnsnotice.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.