Skip to main content

Security report for burgenlandenergie.at

Burgenland Energie · Energy · Austria

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Burgenland Energie is a regional energy provider based in Austria, specializing in renewable energy solutions such as photovoltaic systems, battery storage, heat pumps, and e-mobility services. The company targets private customers and municipalities within the Burgenland region, emphasizing energy independence and sustainability. Their market position is that of a trusted regional leader in renewable energy, supported by a comprehensive portfolio of products and services tailored to modern energy needs. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks including React and Next.js, hosted on AWS infrastructure with Amazon S3 and CloudFront for content delivery. The site demonstrates strong digital maturity with fast performance, mobile optimization, and good SEO practices. Integration with marketing and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and Zoho CRM is implemented with user privacy in mind, including cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses AWS KMS for server-side encryption. OCSP stapling is enabled, but HTTP security headers like HSTS are not fully implemented, representing an area for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy policies and terms of service are present and comprehensive, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the website presents a professional, trustworthy, and secure digital presence aligned with the company's business objectives. Strategic recommendations include enhancing HTTP security headers, continuous monitoring of third-party scripts, and maintaining strong privacy compliance to further strengthen user trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching burgenlandenergie.at

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Burgenland Energie operates primarily in the energy sector with a focus on renewable energy solutions. Their business model includes direct sales and subscription services for photovoltaic systems, battery storage, heat pumps, and e-mobility products. The company serves both private consumers and municipalities, indicating a diversified customer base. Partnerships with telecommunications and energy community organizations expand their ecosystem and service offerings. The company leverages digital channels effectively for customer engagement and service delivery, indicating a forward-looking approach to market positioning and growth.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, AWS KMS encryption, and OCSP stapling. However, the absence of HSTS and other security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed credentials were found. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Incident response and security policy disclosures are not evident, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could be strengthened to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  2. Implement additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid introducing vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies in line with evolving legal requirements and user expectations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted on AWS infrastructure with Amazon S3 and CloudFront for efficient content delivery. The use of server-side encryption with AWS KMS enhances data security. Performance is fast with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site integrates marketing and analytics tools with user privacy controls. Technical debt appears low, and the infrastructure supports scalability and reliability. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and further optimize accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with burgenlandenergie.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review burgenlandenergie.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.