Skip to main content

Security report for burenstam.se

ProactiveMedicine · Healthcare · Sweden

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ProactiveMedicine is a Swedish healthcare consultancy specializing in functional medicine and personalized health coaching. The company offers in-depth health analysis, lifestyle and nutrition programs, and long-term health improvement plans. Their market position is that of a niche provider focusing on scientifically validated tests and personalized plans to optimize health. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and OceanWP theme, reflecting a modern and professional digital presence with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security measures include HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form protection, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, although explicit security headers are not evident in the provided data. The site integrates tracking tools such as Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, and Hotjar, with privacy compliance measures in place including GDPR-aligned policies and consent banners. Overall, the website demonstrates a good balance of business credibility, technical implementation, and privacy compliance, suitable for its small-sized healthcare consultancy profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching burenstam.se

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets individuals seeking personalized health advice and functional medicine services, leveraging a service-based business model with personalized programs and lab testing. Their competitive advantage lies in combining scientific testing with lifestyle coaching, supported by multiple certifications and customer testimonials. The presence of social media channels and a blog indicates active engagement and content marketing efforts. The business operates primarily in Sweden, with a small company size and no visible parent or subsidiary relationships. The website content is consistent and professionally presented, supporting trust and credibility in the healthcare sector.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from spam and abuse. A cookie consent banner with detailed categories supports GDPR compliance. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security suggests room for improvement in hardening the site against common web threats. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The security posture is moderate, appropriate for a small healthcare consultancy, but could be enhanced with additional security best practices and regular audits.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  2. Ensure all WordPress plugins and themes are regularly updated to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  4. Conduct periodic privacy and security audits of third-party scripts and tracking tools to maintain GDPR compliance.
  5. Consider publishing a clear security policy and incident response contact information to increase transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ProactiveMedicine
Description
Personlig hälsorådgivning för dig som vill ta reda på hur bra du kan må. Fokus på funktionsmedicin, hälsoanalys, kost och livsstil för långsiktig hälsa.
Key services
Hälsoanalys på djupet, Mat och livsstil som medicin, Fördjupningsprogram, Funktionsmedicin, Labbtester, Personlig rådgivning
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA v3, CookieYes consent management, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, Hotjar
Frameworks
OceanWP theme, Elementor page builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with customization and rejection options

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Elementor and OceanWP theme
  2. Content is in Swedish with some English metadata
  3. Strong focus on functional medicine and personalized health services
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories
  5. Multiple certifications and memberships displayed as trust signals
  6. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, address, and contact form
  7. No terms of service page found
  8. Security headers not explicitly visible in HTML content
  9. Google reCAPTCHA v3 used for form spam protection
  10. Tracking includes Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, and Hotjar
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the OceanWP theme and Elementor page builder, indicating a modern and flexible infrastructure. It leverages popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection. SEO is supported by the Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Technical risks include the lack of explicit security headers and potential plugin vulnerabilities if not maintained. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with burenstam.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review burenstam.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.