Skip to main content

Security report for bugsbusiness.nl

Bugs Business · Finance · Netherlands

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bugs Business is a specialized software provider and advisory partner focused on the insurance sector in the Netherlands. Their core offering includes the Imago software suite tailored for insurance professionals, aiming to streamline and integrate workflows within the insurance industry. The company positions itself as a niche player delivering configurable, integrated software solutions that connect with other industry platforms such as CCS Level and ANVA. The website content and structured data confirm a professional and focused business model targeting insurance service providers, brokers, and insurers. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins like Yoast SEO and WPML for multilingual support, and it employs Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is well-structured with good SEO and mobile optimization but lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, though security headers and incident response contacts are missing. Overall, the domain registration data is consistent with the business claims, showing a domain age of over a decade and no suspicious patterns. The website is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, indicating good availability and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bugsbusiness.nl

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bugs Business operates in the finance sector, specifically targeting the insurance industry with software and advisory services. Their business model revolves around providing integrated software platforms that reduce the need for multiple applications, enhancing efficiency for insurance brokers, service providers, and insurers. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with other insurance software providers, indicating a collaborative ecosystem approach. The market positioning is niche but well-defined, focusing on configurable and comprehensive solutions for the insurance domain. The company appears to be small-sized with a decade-plus history, suggesting stability and experience. Their digital presence includes multilingual support and active social media engagement via LinkedIn, supporting business development and client outreach. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, support, and consulting services. Growth indicators include active content updates and SEO optimization. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and DNSSEC is enabled on the domain, which are strong indicators of secure communications and domain integrity. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks a security.txt file or explicit incident response contact information, which are important for vulnerability disclosure and incident management. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanisms, which could pose regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, policies, and incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance site security.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response emails (e.g., security@ or abuse@).
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bugs Business
Description
Software speciaal gemaakt voor jou. Imago software is specifiek ontwikkeld voor de assurantiewereld. Wij helpen je werkzaamheden efficiënter en overzichtelijker te maken.
Key services
Imago Office, Imago Direct, Imago Forms, Advisory and support services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, jQuery 3.5.1, Site Kit by Google, WPML (multilingual plugin)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled on domain
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Site Kit by Google
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is focused on insurance software solutions
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages found
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  6. Presence of LinkedIn social media link for company
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3, utilizing popular plugins like Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and WPML for multilingual capabilities. The tech stack includes jQuery 3.5.1 and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site uses Google Fonts for typography and is optimized for mobile devices with responsive design. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML content. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and JSON-LD structured data describing the organization and webpage. Accessibility is basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content. The site does not show signs of technical debt or deprecated technologies but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bugsbusiness.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bugsbusiness.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.