Skip to main content

Security report for btconcept.lv

BT Concept · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BT Concept operates the Boutique Indigo and Boutique Concepta Garderobe retail stores specializing in women's creative style clothing in Riga, Latvia. The business targets local customers seeking boutique fashion and maintains physical store locations with clear contact information. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and consistent branding, supporting the retail business model effectively. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, Google Analytics, and Snowplow for tracking, hosted on a CDN-backed CMS platform likely Multiscreensite. The site is served over HTTPS with cookie consent mechanisms in place, indicating a good level of privacy compliance. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration trust verification. Security posture is solid with HTTPS but could be improved by adding security headers and formal incident response information. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional online presence for a small retail boutique business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching btconcept.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention btconcept.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for btconcept.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is positioned as a local boutique retailer in the Latvian market, focusing on women's creative fashion. It leverages physical store presence and online visibility to attract customers. The business model is straightforward retail with direct customer engagement. The website supports this with clear navigation, contact details, and privacy compliance. The partnership with local service providers such as infolapa.zl.lv and latvijastalrunis.lv suggests integration with local business ecosystems. No evidence of large-scale enterprise or complex subsidiaries is found, indicating a small business scale. The use of modern analytics and marketing tools shows digital maturity appropriate for its size.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent banners, reflecting awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, no advanced security headers were detected, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The site does not expose sensitive data or vulnerable libraries visibly. The use of third-party analytics and CDN scripts introduces typical risks but no immediate vulnerabilities were identified. The lack of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is a gap. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in formal policies and technical headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve trust.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate supply chain risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
BT Concept
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BT Concept
Description
Boutique Indigo & Boutique Concepta Garderobe - Sieviešu kreatīvā stila apģērbu mazumtirdzniecība.
Key services
retail of women's creative style clothing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.0, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Snowplow Analytics, Mapbox, Google Tag Manager, Bower Skrollr, Content Delivery Network (CDN) usage
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Snowplow Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Snowplow
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Site uses HTTPS and modern analytics tools.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with physical addresses, emails, and phone numbers.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; opportunity for improvement.
  7. No forms detected on the homepage or main content.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  9. Site content is in Latvian language targeting local customers.
  10. Site uses a CMS platform likely Multiscreensite based on script and URL patterns.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a CMS platform likely Multiscreensite, using jQuery 3.7.0, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Snowplow Analytics, and Mapbox for mapping services. It loads CSS and JS resources from CDN providers ensuring reasonable performance. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and includes basic SEO meta tags and Open Graph tags. The HTML structure is valid and includes deferred loading for CSS and scripts to improve load times. No complex frameworks or server-side technologies are evident from the client-side code. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with btconcept.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review btconcept.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.