Skip to main content

Security report for brunata.com

Brunata · Energy · Denmark

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Network security.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Brunata is an established company in the energy sector, specializing in energy measurement and management solutions. The company has a strong market presence supported by a domain registered since 1997 and a professional website that targets business and consumer audiences interested in energy services. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and employs modern web technologies and SEO best practices, including structured data and multi-language support. The presence of a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and a detailed privacy policy indicates a mature approach to privacy and GDPR compliance. Technically, the website uses a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Customer Insights, and CookieInformation.com for consent management. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, though there is room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. The security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, but DNSSEC is not enabled and security policies or incident response contacts are not published. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by implementing additional security headers and publishing formal security policies. The website does not show signs of blocking or WAF interference, allowing full content access. The business credibility is high, supported by consistent WHOIS data and trust indicators such as GDPR compliance and detailed cookie policies. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing a security policy and incident response contacts, and considering a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosures. These steps would further strengthen the company's security posture and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching brunata.com

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Brunata operates in the energy sector with a focus on energy measurement and management services. The company targets both business and consumer segments, providing solutions that help optimize energy usage. The long domain age and consistent WHOIS data suggest a stable and reputable business. The website's multi-language support indicates an international or regional market approach. The use of WooCommerce hints at potential e-commerce or service ordering capabilities, though no active cart was detected on the homepage. Marketing and analytics tools are extensively used to understand and engage visitors, supporting a data-driven business model. The absence of explicit contact information on the homepage may indicate a focus on lead generation through other channels or internal contact pages. Overall, Brunata appears to be a medium-sized, established player with a solid digital presence and compliance posture.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with mandatory HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The cookie consent mechanism is robust, offering granular control and transparency, which aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts increases the attack surface but is managed through consent. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by adopting additional security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and maintain GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Brunata
Description
Brunata is a company operating in the energy sector, providing services related to energy measurement and management. The website targets customers interested in energy solutions and related services.
Key services
Energy measurement, Energy management solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Customer Insights, CookieInformation.com consent management
Frameworks
Uncode theme, Visual Composer (WPBakery)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with opt-in and opt-out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Customer Insights, Sourcebuster JS
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Customer Insights, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Sourcebuster JS
Marketing tools
CookieInformation.com
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with WooCommerce but no active cart detected on homepage
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent banner with detailed cookie categories and opt-in/out
  3. Privacy policy is detailed and GDPR compliant
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage HTML
  5. No terms of service page detected
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response info found
  7. Use of multiple third-party tracking and marketing services
  8. Good SEO practices with structured data and meta tags
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Uncode theme and WPBakery (Visual Composer) page builder, with WooCommerce installed for e-commerce capabilities. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Customer Insights, and CookieInformation.com for analytics and consent management. The site uses jQuery and modern CSS techniques for styling and responsiveness. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices including structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph tags. Hosting appears to be managed via the registrar Abion AB with DNS servers at portsdns.se and portsdns.net. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access. Accessibility is basic but present, with focus management in the cookie consent modal. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, though improvements in security headers and performance optimization could be considered.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with brunata.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review brunata.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.