Skip to main content

Security report for brueckenhaus-naumburg.de

Ferienhaus "Brückenhaus Naumburg" · Hospitality · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ferienhaus "Brückenhaus Naumburg" is a small hospitality business offering a lovingly restored historic holiday home located in Naumburg, Germany. The website provides detailed information about the rental property, pricing, availability, and booking options, targeting tourists seeking accommodation in the Saale-Unstrut region. The business positions itself as a niche provider of heritage vacation rentals with a focus on comfort and local charm. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and Slider Revolution, with a booking system integrated for user convenience. The site is mobile-optimized and well-structured, providing a good user experience and clear navigation. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy or security policies. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, though it could improve privacy compliance and security posture by adding missing policies and headers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching brueckenhaus-naumburg.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
48
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on vacation home rentals in a specific German region. Its competitive advantage lies in the unique historic nature of the property and personalized service, including special offers for repeat customers and flexible booking options. Revenue streams are primarily from holiday rentals, with options for separate apartment rentals and additional guest accommodations. The target customers are leisure travelers and families seeking a quiet, scenic vacation spot. The website reflects a small-scale operation with no indication of parent or subsidiary companies. The partnership ecosystem includes local businesses such as nearby hotels and wine manufacturers, enhancing the guest experience. Strategic observations suggest a focus on quality and niche marketing rather than volume.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism in place. However, it lacks comprehensive security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The absence of a privacy policy and terms of service reduces compliance with GDPR and other regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small hospitality website but could be enhanced to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen site security.
  3. Create a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency around data protection practices and cookie usage to align with GDPR requirements.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ferienhaus "Brückenhaus Naumburg"
Description
Ferienhaus in Naumburg: liebevoll restauriertes Brückenhaus zwischen Weinbergen am Saale-Ufer. Aktivurlaub in der Saale-Unstrut-Region.
Key services
Holiday home rental, Separate apartment rentals, Booking and availability management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Slider Revolution, jQuery, WP Booking System Premium, GeneratePress theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by cookie notice)

Analytics and tracking

Services
WP Statistics (implied)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, WP Booking System Premium
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress site for a small hospitality business.
  2. Clear and detailed information about holiday home rental services.
  3. Integrated booking system with calendar and pricing.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone and email.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  8. No social media links found in provided content.
  9. Use of modern plugins and SEO tools.
  10. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using well-known plugins for SEO, sliders, and booking management. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by slider and booking system scripts. The site uses custom fonts and a child theme for branding consistency. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but DNS uses UI-DNS nameservers. The site lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy-related metadata. SEO is supported by Yoast plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business website but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with brueckenhaus-naumburg.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review brueckenhaus-naumburg.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.