Skip to main content

Security report for brownmaids.com

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Brownmaids.com operates as an adult content search engine specializing in ebony and related pornographic video categories. The site aggregates and links to a wide range of external adult video platforms, serving an adults-only audience. Its business model relies on affiliate marketing through numerous partner adult sites. The website has been active since 2008, indicating a stable presence in the niche adult entertainment market. However, it lacks direct company branding and detailed business information on the site itself. Technically, the website uses standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Cloudflare DNS services. The site is accessible over HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and modern privacy features. The search functionality posts data to an external domain, which may raise privacy concerns. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, and SEO practices are minimal but functional. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS but does not implement key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. The referrer policy is set to unsafe-url, which could expose user navigation data. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and contact information is limited to an abuse email address. These factors indicate a low maturity in privacy compliance and security best practices. Overall, brownmaids.com presents a niche adult content aggregator with basic technical implementation and limited transparency. The site should improve its security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility to enhance user trust and reduce risk exposure.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching brownmaids.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets adult consumers interested in ebony and diverse adult video content, leveraging affiliate partnerships with multiple adult video platforms. Its competitive advantage lies in aggregating a large volume of categorized adult videos, simplifying user search and discovery. Revenue likely derives from affiliate commissions and advertising. The absence of direct company information and contact details suggests a lean operational model focused on content aggregation rather than original production. The partnership ecosystem is extensive, linking to many adult sites, which may provide diversified revenue streams but also increases dependency on third parties. Growth indicators are limited due to lack of public business data, but the domain's longevity since 2008 suggests sustained market presence.

Security posture

The security maturity of brownmaids.com is low to moderate. While HTTPS is enforced, the absence of critical security headers and the use of an unsafe referrer policy expose users to potential privacy and security risks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies beyond an abuse contact email is present. The site does not provide privacy or cookie policies, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The external search form posting to a third-party domain may introduce data privacy concerns. Overall, the site lacks comprehensive security controls and transparency, which could impact user trust and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and a safer Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Add terms of service and a security policy outlining data protection and incident response procedures.
  4. Consider enabling DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  5. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience across devices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Free ebony porn video search engine linking to various adult content categories and videos.
Key services
Adult video search, Affiliate linking to adult video platforms, Categorized adult video content
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content search engine focusing on ebony and related pornographic categories.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information limited to abuse email in footer; no company emails or phone numbers found.
  4. No security headers detected; referrer policy set to unsafe-url which may leak user data.
  5. Website uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security configurations.
  6. Multiple external affiliate links to adult content sites present.
  7. No social media or physical contact information found.
  8. Content is explicit adult material with no age gate but uses RTA label for parental filtering.
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found beyond basic meta tags.
  10. Search form posts to external domain cumguru.com, indicating data collection outside main domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack with HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. It relies on Cloudflare for DNS services but does not appear to use a CMS or advanced frameworks. Performance is moderate with preloading of CSS and scripts, but no advanced optimization techniques detected. The site lacks structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags beyond basic meta tags, limiting SEO potential. Accessibility features are minimal, and mobile responsiveness is basic. The external search form posts data to a third-party domain, which may affect data control. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but dated, with opportunities for modernization and improved security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with brownmaids.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review brownmaids.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.