Skip to main content

Security report for brocenuenergija.lv

SIA Brocēnu Enerģija · Energy · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

30/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Brocēnu Enerģija is a Latvian company specializing in the production of heat energy using renewable wood chip fuel. Founded in 2010, the company operates a boiler house in Brocēni and is supported by government climate finance instruments. The website presents a professional image with clear information about the business, its services, and contact details. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and uses modern web technologies, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and published policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is legitimate and functional but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  5. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching brocenuenergija.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
30

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company occupies a niche in the renewable energy sector in Latvia, focusing on sustainable heat energy production from local biomass resources. It benefits from government funding and licenses, indicating regulatory compliance and market trust. The business model targets local clients and suppliers, emphasizing environmental benefits and energy independence. The website supports business credibility with clear contact points and project information but lacks extensive certifications or security disclosures. Growth potential exists through expanding client base and supplier engagement.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others that enhance protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which limits transparency in security management. No forms or input fields were detected that require additional input validation or protection. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve web security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to enhance GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to increase transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update plugins and themes to avoid vulnerabilities from outdated components.
  5. Enhance privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and data protection practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Brocēnu Enerģija
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Brocēnu Enerģija
Description
SIA Brocēnu Enerģija is a company founded in 2010 that produces heat energy using wood chips as a renewable local fuel source. The company operates a boiler house in Brocēni, Latvia, providing sustainable energy and reducing dependence on fossil fuels. The project is co-financed by the Latvian Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development's Climate Change Financial Instrument.
Key services
Heat energy production from wood chips, Consultations and technical support for clients, Procurement of heat energy sources
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Redux Framework, Bootstrap, jQuery, Slick Slider, Fancybox, Jarallax, Isotope, Swiper
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Elementor and several common plugins.
  2. Content is focused on renewable heat energy production using wood chips.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email and phone.
  4. No cookie consent or detailed privacy compliance mechanisms detected.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies published.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; limits domain legitimacy verification.
  7. No advertising or tracking services detected.
  8. No forms detected on the homepage content.
  9. Website is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Elementor page builder and several common JavaScript libraries and CSS frameworks such as Bootstrap, jQuery, Slick Slider, and Fancybox. The site loads multiple external resources including Google Fonts and WordPress core scripts. Performance is moderate with no evident critical issues but could benefit from optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and the site structure is clear. No advanced hosting or CDN information was detected. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features but meets basic standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with brocenuenergija.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review brocenuenergija.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.