Skip to main content

Security report for bridge.xyz

Bridge · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bridge.xyz is a fintech technology platform specializing in stablecoin infrastructure and APIs designed for developers and businesses to facilitate global money movement. The company offers a suite of services including stablecoin orchestration, issuance, wallet management, card issuance, and cross-border payments, positioning itself as a niche player in the stablecoin payments ecosystem. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and modern web technologies, targeting developers and enterprises seeking efficient stablecoin payment solutions. The platform leverages Webflow CMS, JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js and Lottie animations, and integrates tracking and consent tools like Google Tag Manager and TrustArc, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bridge.xyz

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
GDPR outside view
85
Average
72

Not counted

  • Network security: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bridge operates in the finance and technology sectors, focusing on B2B stablecoin payment infrastructure. Its business model revolves around providing APIs and infrastructure to enable quick, cost-effective, and seamless global money movement using stablecoins. The company targets developers and businesses requiring stablecoin orchestration and issuance capabilities. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and trust signals such as cookie consent and professional design. While direct contact details are limited, the presence of demo request forms suggests a sales-driven approach. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, and the domain age aligns with a credible fintech entity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options implemented. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The presence of cookie consent mechanisms and tracking transparency tools indicates awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and incident response contacts represents compliance gaps. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which could enhance security transparency and incident handling readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Provide explicit security incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to formalize security communication channels.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Expand direct contact options such as verified company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bridge
Description
A stablecoin platform built for developers. Enable quick, easy, and cost-effective global money movement that seamlessly integrates with your existing applications.
Key services
Stablecoin orchestration, Stablecoin issuance, Global card issuance, Wallet services, Cross-border payments
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, JavaScript, Lottie animations, Swiper.js, TrustArc cookie consent, Google Tag Manager, Apollo.io tracking, Marker.io feedback tool
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Apollo.io
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Apollo.io, Marker.io
Marketing tools
Apollo.io, Marker.io
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content rich for a fintech stablecoin platform.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via TrustArc indicating some privacy compliance effort.
  4. Contact information is limited to forms; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured, indicating good security posture.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools is evident.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS with a modern JavaScript tech stack including Lottie animations and Swiper.js for interactive UI elements. It uses third-party services such as TrustArc for cookie consent, Google Tag Manager for analytics, Apollo.io for tracking, and Marker.io for feedback. Hosting is provided by Webflow, ensuring reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks are minimal, but the lack of some compliance documentation and direct contact info could impact trust and regulatory adherence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bridge.xyz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bridge.xyz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.