Skip to main content

Security report for breezestudio.lv

Breezestudio · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Breezestudio.lv is a wellness and beauty service provider based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in treatments tailored for women such as aquabike, facial treatments, laser hair removal, and weight correction programs. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image targeting women seeking health and beauty services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, integrating modern analytics and tracking tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA implemented, but lacks security headers and formal privacy/cookie policies, indicating room for compliance improvement. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional and professional but should enhance privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching breezestudio.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the healthcare sector focusing on wellness and beauty services for women in the Riga area. Its offerings include a wide range of treatments from mechanical therapies to nutrition counseling, positioning it as a comprehensive wellness studio. The company leverages social media channels for marketing and customer engagement. The business model is service-oriented with direct customer bookings and an e-shop for products. The presence of multiple physical locations and contact numbers indicates a small but established local business. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The company appears to maintain a moderate market position with a focus on quality and customer satisfaction.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms, which are positive security measures. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a security.txt file and incident response contact information suggests limited formal security governance. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which may expose the business to compliance risks under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but can be improved by implementing recommended headers and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and provide incident response contact details to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security audits to maintain a strong security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Breezestudio
Description
What are you looking for? We know everything about a woman, what she wants, loves, and what result she expects. Our concept is designed so that every woman can save her time, look and feel happy and healthy.
Key services
Aquabike, PelviTone Chair, Mechanical treatments, EMRF FACE face muscle training, EMS Sculptor, Cryolipolysis, Massages and treatments, Wraps, Laser hair removal, Facial treatments
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Astra Theme, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich focused on women's wellness and beauty services.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone numbers and physical addresses in Riga, Latvia.
  4. No security.txt or incident response information found.
  5. Use of modern WordPress technologies and popular plugins like Elementor and Astra theme.
  6. Tracking and analytics scripts from Google and Facebook are present.
  7. No evidence of suspicious or malicious content.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, indicating a flexible and widely supported infrastructure. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing purposes. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Performance is moderate, with caching plugins evident from minified CSS files. However, no explicit hosting provider information was found. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but meets basic standards. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are needed to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with breezestudio.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review breezestudio.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.