Skip to main content

Security report for breastimplantsbymentor.net

Global BIBM · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website breastimplantsbymentor.net represents the Global BIBM brand, associated with Mentor breast implant products under Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices. It serves a global audience with localized versions in multiple languages and regions. The site provides healthcare-related information targeting both healthcare professionals and patients interested in breast implant solutions. The business model is primarily B2B and B2C within the healthcare sector, with a strong market position supported by a reputable parent company. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10, leveraging modern web technologies and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices and a consistent branding approach. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. No direct contact information or incident response details are published, which could be improved. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching breastimplantsbymentor.net

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the healthcare sector focusing on breast implant products and related services. It benefits from the strong brand equity of Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices and targets a global market with localized content. The business model includes direct consumer engagement and healthcare professional support. The presence of multiple language sites indicates a broad international reach. The company maintains a consistent brand image and legal compliance, enhancing credibility. Partnerships and related domains align with corporate structure and regional market strategies. The absence of direct contact details on the main page suggests a controlled communication channel, possibly via localized sites or healthcare providers.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice to prevent DNS spoofing. Security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS are not explicitly detected, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The site lacks a published security policy or incident response contact information, which are important for transparency and trust. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adding missing headers and public security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and integrity.
  2. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information.
  3. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Improve contact information availability to support user trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Global BIBM
Description
Mentor is a brand associated with breast implants and related healthcare products, supporting customers with breast augmentation and reconstruction solutions.
Key services
Breast implant products, Patient and healthcare professional information, Global localized websites
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Drupal 10 CMS with modern frontend libraries.
  2. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the analyzed page.
  4. Multiple localized versions of the site exist for global markets.
  5. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages found.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. External links mostly to trusted domains related to analytics and corporate sites.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely used CMS platform, indicating a robust and maintainable infrastructure. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tracking, which are industry standards. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features, enhancing user experience. Performance is moderate, with preloading of fonts and optimized images. The domain is registered with a reputable registrar and uses corporate DNS servers, supporting reliability. However, the absence of DNSSEC and some security headers indicates technical debt in security hardening. The site structure and metadata are well implemented, supporting SEO and social sharing. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with room for security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with breastimplantsbymentor.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review breastimplantsbymentor.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.