Skip to main content

Security report for braintreegateway.com

PayPal Braintree · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Braintree Gateway, a PayPal subsidiary, operates as a major payment gateway service provider enabling merchants to process online payments securely. The website focuses on user login functionality with integration for both Braintree and PayPal accounts, supporting merchant and developer needs including sandbox testing environments. The business is positioned strongly within the finance sector, leveraging PayPal's brand and infrastructure to maintain market leadership in payment processing services. Technically, the site employs modern TLS protocols (1.2 and 1.3), uses Amazon CloudFront CDN, and integrates PayPal analytics and marketing tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. However, performance metrics indicate a slower load time, and mobile optimization is basic, suggesting room for technical improvements. Security posture is solid with HSTS enabled, valid SPF and DMARC DNS records, and no detected SSL vulnerabilities, though enhancements like OCSP stapling and DNSSEC could further strengthen defenses. The absence of explicit privacy, terms of service, and security policy pages on the login page limits transparency. Overall, the site demonstrates a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness but would benefit from improved policy disclosures and technical optimizations.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of braintreegateway.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching braintreegateway.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
89
Security headers
85
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention braintreegateway.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
17,119
Employees
0
Customers
17,078
Third parties
41
Weak passwords
7%

17 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for braintreegateway.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Braintree Gateway operates as an essential enterprise entity within the finance sector, providing payment gateway services integrated with PayPal. Its business model centers on facilitating secure online payment processing for merchants, supported by sandbox environments for developers. The company leverages PayPal's extensive ecosystem, enhancing its market position and trust signals. Key services include merchant account management, payment processing, and PayPal login integration. The target audience comprises merchants and businesses requiring reliable payment solutions. The partnership ecosystem includes PayPal and related developer and support domains. Growth indicators are implied by the use of advanced analytics and marketing tools. Strategic observations highlight the need for enhanced transparency in privacy and security policies to align with evolving compliance standards.

Security posture

The security maturity of the Braintree Gateway website is good, with strong TLS configurations (TLS 1.2 and 1.3), HSTS enforcement, and valid SPF and DMARC DNS records, reducing risks of common email spoofing and man-in-the-middle attacks. No known SSL vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed, FREAK, or Logjam were detected. However, the lack of DNSSEC and CAA records presents potential DNS and certificate issuance risks. OCSP stapling is not enabled, which could delay certificate revocation checks. The site employs Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. The absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs limits transparency and may impact compliance with GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the security posture is robust but could be improved by adding explicit policies, DNS security enhancements, and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Enable OCSP stapling to improve SSL certificate revocation checking and reduce latency.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity and prevent spoofing attacks.
  3. Add CAA DNS records to restrict which certificate authorities can issue certificates for the domain.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy, security, and terms of service policies accessible from the login page.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using JavaScript with jQuery and integrates multiple PayPal-hosted scripts for analytics, marketing, and reCAPTCHA services. Hosting is via Amazon CloudFront CDN, ensuring global content delivery. TLS 1.2 and 1.3 protocols are supported with HSTS enabled, indicating a modern security setup. Performance is suboptimal with a load time near 10 seconds and a large page size (~2.6MB), suggesting potential technical debt or heavy resource usage. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, indicating opportunities for improvement. No CMS or specific web frameworks were detected from the HTML content. The DNS setup includes valid SPF and DMARC records but lacks DNSSEC and CAA, which are recommended for enhanced security. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from performance tuning and additional security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100 +11Low23 findingsView report
  2. 70/100 −10Medium20 findingsView report
  3. 80/100Low25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with braintreegateway.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review braintreegateway.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.