Skip to main content

Security report for boundhub.com

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BoundHub is an adult entertainment website specializing in bondage, domination, and fetish video content. It operates as a niche video sharing platform targeting adults interested in BDSM and related fetishes. The site offers user accounts, video uploads, community features, and monetizes through affiliate advertising and ad networks. Technically, it uses the Kernel Video Sharing CMS, integrates Google Analytics, and employs basic age verification overlays. The website is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO but lacks advanced accessibility features. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and explicit privacy policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Overall, the site functions well for its niche but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and trust signals to enhance credibility and user safety.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching boundhub.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
32
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention boundhub.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9,255
Employees
0
Customers
9,218
Third parties
37
Weak passwords
20%

14 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for boundhub.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate boundhub.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
28
Registered
28
Resolving
28
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-19

Masked preview

  • bo•••••.comMediumomission
  • bo•••••.comMediumomission
  • ho••••••.comMediumreplacement

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of boundhub.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BoundHub occupies a niche segment within the adult media industry, focusing on fetish and bondage content. Its business model relies on user-generated content and affiliate advertising, with partnerships to related adult sites. The platform targets adult consumers seeking specialized fetish videos and webcam services. The site has been operational since at least 2015, indicating some market presence. However, lack of transparent business information and contact details limits trustworthiness. The partnership ecosystem includes known adult networks, enhancing reach. Growth potential depends on improving compliance and security to meet evolving regulatory standards and user expectations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enforced and an adult content age gate. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are essential to mitigate common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The absence of WHOIS data further undermines trust and raises potential risks related to domain ownership and abuse handling. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no clear GDPR adherence or cookie policy transparency. Overall, the site is functional but vulnerable to security and compliance gaps that could impact user safety and regulatory standing.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish clear and detailed privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance measures.
  3. Establish incident response and vulnerability disclosure processes, including a security.txt file and dedicated security contact channels.
  4. Improve transparency by providing verified WHOIS registration data and clear business contact information.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Bondage, domination, fetishes, toys, webcams - videos and photos.
Key services
Adult fetish video hosting and sharing, User accounts with upload and favorite features, Community features, Affiliate advertising
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Kernel Video Sharing CMS, jQuery, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Adult content age verification overlay
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
JuicyAds
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content platform focused on bondage and fetish videos.
  2. Contains explicit adult content with age verification overlay.
  3. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible domain registration or privacy issues.
  4. Uses Kernel Video Sharing CMS and Google Analytics.
  5. Advertising via JuicyAds and affiliate programs present.
  6. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found.
  7. No privacy or security policies beyond basic terms and DMCA pages.
  8. No advanced security headers detected.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Kernel Video Sharing CMS platform, utilizing jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. The HTML structure is valid with responsive design elements and meta tags supporting SEO. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images and asynchronous script loading. Advertising is integrated via JuicyAds and affiliate programs, embedded through iframes. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider details are discernible. The site lacks modern security configurations and accessibility enhancements, indicating technical debt and opportunities for modernization to improve security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with boundhub.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review boundhub.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.