Skip to main content

Security report for bostonherald.com

Boston Herald · Media · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Boston Herald is a prominent local news media organization serving the Boston, Massachusetts area, providing comprehensive coverage of news, sports, politics, entertainment, weather, and obituaries. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with a subscription-based business model supported by a parent company, MediaNews Group. The site is well-branded and targets a general audience seeking timely and relevant local information. Technically, the site is built on WordPress and integrates multiple modern technologies including Google Tag Manager, Auth0 for authentication, and sophisticated ad and analytics platforms such as Google Ad Manager and Parsely. The site is mobile optimized and employs consent management via Osano, reflecting a commitment to privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses standard security headers, and manages cookie consent effectively. However, the absence of a public WHOIS record and lack of explicit security policies or incident response contacts slightly reduce trustworthiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, Boston Herald's website is professional, secure, and compliant with privacy regulations, though improvements could be made in transparency around security policies and contact information. The domain WHOIS data absence warrants monitoring but does not currently undermine the site's legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bostonherald.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Boston Herald holds a strong market position as a leading local news provider in Boston, leveraging a subscription revenue model and digital advertising. Its parent company, MediaNews Group, supports its operations. The site targets a broad audience interested in local news and related content. The integration of multiple advertising and analytics platforms indicates a sophisticated approach to monetization and audience engagement. The presence of branded content and affiliate partnerships further diversify revenue streams. The site’s technical infrastructure supports scalability and user engagement, positioning it well for continued growth in the competitive media landscape.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive cookie consent management, and use of security headers. The integration of third-party authentication (Auth0) and paywall technology (Sophi) suggests attention to secure user access and content protection. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No immediate vulnerabilities or security misconfigurations were observed in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance documentation and communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Increase visibility of official contact information to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Boston Herald
Description
The Boston Herald is the leading source of breaking news, local news, sports, politics, entertainment, opinion and weather in Boston, Massachusetts.
Key services
news reporting, sports coverage, politics, entertainment, weather updates, obituaries, subscription services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Auth0, AccuWeather API, DoubleClick for Publishers (Google Ad Manager), Osano Consent Management, Sophi Paywall, Marfeel SDK, jQuery, Bootstrap Icons
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Parsely, Comscore, Quantcast, BlueConic
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ad Manager, Amazon Ads, Ad Lightning
Tracking pixels
Parsely, BlueConic, Quantcast, Comscore
Marketing tools
Pushly
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional news media site with extensive content and navigation
  2. Uses modern web technologies and consent management
  3. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a major news site
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages found
  7. Advertising and analytics are implemented with major providers
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. Site is fully accessible without WAF or blocking
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Auth0 for authentication, and multiple advertising and analytics integrations. The site uses responsive design techniques and is optimized for mobile devices. Performance appears moderate with use of asynchronous script loading and CDN resources. The presence of multiple third-party scripts and ad networks introduces complexity but is managed with consent mechanisms. Technical debt is minimal, though opportunities exist to streamline third-party dependencies and improve accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bostonherald.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bostonherald.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.