Skip to main content

Security report for bostonglobemedia.com

Boston Globe Media · Media · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Boston Globe Media is a locally owned independent media company serving Boston and the New England region, operating the largest newsroom in New England. The company focuses on delivering award-winning journalism and local news content, positioning itself as a key regional media player. The website reflects a professional media publishing business model with a clear target audience of local residents and businesses. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO and New Relic Browser monitoring, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, demonstrating compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available. The absence of WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty about domain registration legitimacy, but the overall professional presentation and content quality support a high trust level. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security policies, adding vulnerability disclosure information, and enhancing accessibility features to further strengthen the website's security and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bostonglobemedia.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bostonglobemedia.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
13
Employees
0
Customers
13
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
8%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bostonglobemedia.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Boston Globe Media holds a strong market position as the largest newsroom in New England, emphasizing local relevance and national resonance. Its business model centers on media publishing and journalism, targeting local audiences with high-quality news content. The company leverages modern digital marketing and analytics tools to optimize reach and engagement. While no direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified, the company maintains a consistent brand and professional online presence. Growth indicators include active content updates and comprehensive SEO implementation. The lack of visible contact emails or phone numbers on the main site suggests a preference for contact forms, which may impact direct customer engagement. Overall, Boston Globe Media demonstrates a solid operational foundation with opportunities to enhance transparency and security communications.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, and implementation of cookie consent mechanisms. Usage of New Relic Browser monitoring indicates active performance and error tracking. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and preparedness communication. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The missing WHOIS data reduces confidence in domain registration legitimacy, which is a minor risk factor. Recommendations include publishing security and incident response policies, establishing a vulnerability disclosure channel, and providing direct security contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Provide direct security contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Boston Globe Media
Description
A locally owned independent media company serving Boston and the region with award-winning journalism from the largest newsroom in New England.
Key services
News publishing, Journalism, Local and regional media content
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, New Relic Browser monitoring, OneTrust cookie consent, Typekit fonts
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic Browser
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, OneTrust
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking detected.
  2. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  3. Strong SEO and structured data implementation.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
  5. No direct security or incident response contact information found.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and warrants monitoring.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization and OneTrust for cookie consent management. It uses Adobe Typekit for fonts and New Relic Browser for performance monitoring and error tracking. The site loads resources from trusted CDNs and employs modern JavaScript libraries. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced SEO and social media integration. Hosting details are not explicit but likely involve managed WordPress hosting with CDN support. Technical risks are minimal but include the need for ongoing monitoring of third-party dependencies and potential improvements in accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bostonglobemedia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bostonglobemedia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.