Skip to main content

Security report for boerenbed.nl

BoerenBed · Hospitality · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BoerenBed is a hospitality company specializing in farm camping and glamping experiences across multiple European countries, primarily targeting families seeking authentic outdoor vacations. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with rich content including customer reviews and detailed service offerings. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and custom scripts for UI enhancements, ensuring a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching boerenbed.nl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BoerenBed operates in the hospitality sector with a niche focus on farm stays and glamping, offering services in the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Germany, and the UK through partner domains. The business model revolves around vacation bookings and last-minute deals, targeting families and outdoor enthusiasts. The presence of multiple localized domains indicates a strategic approach to market segmentation. Customer testimonials and reviews enhance credibility, while the use of third-party analytics and marketing tools supports data-driven growth. The company maintains a medium-sized operation with consistent branding and a clear value proposition centered on authentic farm experiences.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented according to GDPR principles. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, as well as lack of published security policies or incident response contacts, represents compliance gaps. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Security headers were not explicitly detected in the provided data, suggesting room for improvement. Overall, the site is secure but could enhance transparency and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly linked from the homepage.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal terms.
  3. Include explicit security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BoerenBed
Description
Échte gezelligheid en tijd voor elkaar tijdens jouw glamping kampeer ervaring ✔ Boerencampings ✔ Kampeerboerderijen ✔ Mini campings
Key services
Boerencampings, Kampeerboerderijen, Mini campings, Vacation bookings, Last-minute deals
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Bakery Creative Orange (custom scripts and CSS), FontAwesome, Flatpickr (date picker), Swiper.js (carousel), AltTagger (image alt text enhancement)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, AltTagger
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
AltTagger
Marketing tools
AltTagger
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear branding and consistent messaging.
  2. Strong focus on family-friendly farm camping experiences in multiple European countries.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with granular user options.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. Contact information is limited to a phone number; no email or physical address found in visible content.
  6. Multiple third-party scripts used for analytics and UI enhancements.
  7. No signs of security blocking or WAF challenges.
  8. Customer reviews and testimonials are prominently displayed, enhancing trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Flatpickr for date selection, Swiper.js for carousels, and custom scripts from Bakery Creative Orange. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with multiple external resources loaded asynchronously. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details were not explicitly found. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance optimizations, as well as improved security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with boerenbed.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review boerenbed.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.