Skip to main content

Security report for bodfeld-apotheke.de

Bodfeld Apotheke · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bodfeld Apotheke operates as a professional online pharmacy based in Germany, offering a wide range of pharmaceutical products, cosmetics, and healthcare items. The website targets general consumers seeking convenient and secure online access to medicines and related products. The business model focuses on e-commerce retail with additional services such as electronic prescription fulfillment and customer account management. The company maintains a medium-sized market presence supported by trusted certifications and partnerships with recognized price comparison and review platforms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bodfeld-apotheke.de

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
65
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bodfeld-apotheke.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,758
Employees
0
Customers
1,758
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
13%

13 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bodfeld-apotheke.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate bodfeld-apotheke.de and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
48
Registered
48
Resolving
48
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-20

Masked preview

  • bd•••••••••••••.deMediumomission
  • bo••••••••••••••.deMediumtransposition
  • bo••••••••••••••.deMediumtransposition

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of bodfeld-apotheke.de with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages partnerships with idealo, medipreis, medizinfuchs, sparmedo, and apomio to enhance market reach and credibility. Its business model is centered on providing a comprehensive product catalog with competitive pricing and fast delivery across Germany. The use of trusted certifications like Trusted Shops and compliance with GDPR regulations strengthens customer trust. The website's design and navigation support a positive user experience, facilitating customer retention and growth in the competitive online pharmacy sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforcement, secure login forms, and cookie consent management via Usercentrics. Trusted Shops and other certifications further indicate adherence to security and quality standards. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy documentation are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for security vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bodfeld Apotheke
Description
Online pharmacy offering a wide range of medicines, cosmetics, and healthcare products with secure and fast delivery in Germany.
Key services
Online sale of medicines, Cosmetics and body care products, Prescription fulfillment including E-Rezept (electronic prescription), Customer account management, Fast and secure delivery within Germany
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics CMP, PayPal SDK, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Vue.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Secure login forms with CSRF tokens
  • Cookie consent management
  • Trusted Shops and other certifications displayed
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Usercentrics CMP
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management Platform, Trusted Shops Widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional online pharmacy with a broad product catalog.
  2. Uses modern JavaScript frameworks and third-party integrations for consent and analytics.
  3. Strong trust signals via certifications and partner logos.
  4. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges.
  5. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities in HTML.
  6. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact via form only.
  8. Security headers could be improved for enhanced protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with Vue.js framework, integrated with Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for analytics and consent management. Hosting is managed via Google Cloud DNS, indicating reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. The CMS appears custom or proprietary, which may require dedicated maintenance. SEO optimization is basic but present. The site includes multiple third-party integrations for payment (PayPal) and trust badges (Trusted Shops). Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional e-commerce experience but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bodfeld-apotheke.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bodfeld-apotheke.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.