Skip to main content

Security report for bock-dachtechnik.de

Bock Dachtechnik GmbH · Energy · Germany

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bock Dachtechnik GmbH is a traditional roofing and metalworking master craftsman company based in Freising, Germany, with a history dating back to 1910. The company specializes in roofing, flat roofs, photovoltaic installations, and related services, targeting local residential and commercial customers. Their website reflects a well-established local business with clear service offerings and contact channels. Technically, the site is built on the ProcessWire CMS, uses modern analytics and tracking tools, and is hosted on a German hosting provider. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though accessibility is basic. Security posture is good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bock-dachtechnik.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a specialist in roofing and solar energy solutions with a strong local presence and a long tradition. Their business model focuses on service delivery with a strong emphasis on quality craftsmanship and customer trust. The website supports lead generation through contact forms and direct contact links. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram supports community engagement. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found. The company targets homeowners and businesses in the Freising region, leveraging its historical reputation and specialization in flat roofs and photovoltaics as competitive advantages.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. Multiple analytics tools are used, including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Matomo, with user consent. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are provided, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but could benefit from additional hardening and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to improve security posture.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and compliance.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools for vulnerabilities and privacy compliance.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.
  5. Consider adding terms of service to clarify user and business obligations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bock Dachtechnik GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bock Dachtechnik GmbH
Description
Meisterbetrieb für Dachdecker- und Spenglerarbeiten in Freising und Umgebung: Spezialist für Photovoltaik, Dachsanierung, Flachdach- und Terrassenabdichtung, kompetent und ohne versteckte Kosten.
Key services
Dachdecker- und Spenglerarbeiten, Wärmedämmung und Abdichtung, Dachfenstereinbau und Gaubenbau, Trockenbau- und Abrissarbeiten, Installation von Photovoltaikanlagen, Dachbegrünung, Be- und Entkiesung
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Matomo Analytics, ProcessWire CMS, CCM19 Cookie Consent Manager
Frameworks
ProcessWire
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL and external links)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Matomo
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in German language targeting local customers.
  3. Clear contact information and social media presence enhance trust.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy indicate GDPR compliance.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policies found.
  6. Use of multiple analytics and tracking tools with consent mechanism.
  7. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  8. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern CMS (ProcessWire) and includes popular analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Matomo. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. Hosting is provided by kasserver.com, a German hosting provider. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The site uses jQuery 3.7.1, a current version, reducing risks from outdated libraries. Cookie consent is managed by CCM19, a German cookie consent manager, indicating compliance with EU regulations. There is room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid and appropriate for a small to medium local business.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bock-dachtechnik.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bock-dachtechnik.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.