Skip to main content

Security report for bmegrowth.es

BME · Finance · Spain

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BME Growth is a specialized segment of Bolsas y Mercados Españoles (BME) focused on providing small and medium enterprises (SMEs) with access to capital markets. The platform facilitates financing, liquidity, and investor engagement for growth-oriented companies in Spain. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent branding aligned with BME's corporate identity, targeting investors and companies interested in growth market opportunities. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and analytics. It also uses OneTrust for cookie consent management, indicating a mature approach to privacy compliance. The site is mobile responsive and offers a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, suggesting room for improvement in security hardening. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query restrictions, limiting domain legitimacy assessment, but the website's content and affiliation with BME strongly indicate a legitimate and trustworthy entity. Overall, BME Growth's website is a well-structured, professional platform serving its niche market effectively, with good privacy compliance and a solid technical foundation. Enhancements in security headers and accessibility could further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bmegrowth.es

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
100
Email security
40
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bmegrowth.es, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for bmegrowth.es right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BME Growth operates as a financial market segment under the umbrella of Bolsas y Mercados Españoles (BME), targeting SMEs seeking capital market access. Its competitive advantage lies in providing a streamlined, regulated platform tailored for growth companies, supported by registered advisors and liquidity providers. Revenue streams likely include listing fees, trading commissions, and ancillary services. The target customers are SMEs and investors interested in emerging growth opportunities. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with BME and related market segments such as BME Scaleup. The website content and social media presence reflect active engagement and transparency, supporting growth and investor confidence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, aligning with GDPR requirements. The absence of visible security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options suggests potential gaps in defense-in-depth. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were detected, and no vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, indicating an area for improvement in transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a financial market platform but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies regularly to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BME
Description
BME Growth facilitates small companies with attractive expansion projects an easy and efficient access to the stock market.
Key services
Market listing for SMEs, Trading platform, Investor information and incentives, Registered advisors and liquidity providers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Strong presence of official branding and regulatory information.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query restrictions by Red.es.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content; contact is via web form.
  6. Social media presence is strong with official BME accounts linked.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL is enabled.
  8. Use of modern tracking and consent management tools.
  9. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of JavaScript, jQuery, and Bootstrap for front-end development, with integration of Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for analytics and tracking. OneTrust is used for cookie consent management, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. The site appears to be hosted on a stable platform with SSL/TLS enabled, ensuring secure communications. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site is mobile responsive and offers a clear navigation structure. No CMS was explicitly detected. Technical risks include lack of explicit security headers and potential dependency on third-party scripts which require monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bmegrowth.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bmegrowth.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.