Skip to main content

Security report for blv.lv

BLV · Finance · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

48/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BLV is a Latvian business specializing in payroll and accounting services, targeting companies with more than 20 employees and offering cloud-based accounting software with automated checklists. The website presents a professional image with clear service descriptions and client logos, indicating a trusted position in the Latvian market. The technical infrastructure includes common web technologies such as jQuery and Lightcase.js, with Google Analytics for user tracking. However, the site lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, and no WHOIS data was retrievable due to query limits, which limits full trust verification. Security posture is basic with no detected security headers or incident response information, suggesting room for improvement in compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blv.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BLV operates in the finance sector, providing essential payroll and accounting outsourcing services to businesses in Latvia. Their business model focuses on service delivery combined with cloud software solutions, appealing to medium-sized enterprises. The presence of logos from reputed clients suggests a solid market position. The company appears to emphasize ease of use and trustworthiness, but lacks visible certifications or detailed compliance disclosures. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital presence and compliance transparency.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a basic security posture. HTTPS is presumably enabled (not explicitly confirmed), but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, privacy compliance documentation, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  3. Deploy security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels.
  5. Obtain and display relevant certifications or trust badges to enhance credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BLV
Description
BLV provides accounting and payroll services, specializing in payroll for companies with more than 20 employees and cloud-based accounting software with automated checklists. They target businesses starting or operating in Latvia.
Key services
Payroll services, Accounting services, Cloud accounting software, Consultation and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Lightcase.js, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information limited to a phone number and call scheduling link; no email addresses found.
  5. No security policy, incident response, or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  6. Website uses jQuery and Lightcase.js; Google Analytics is implemented.
  7. Content is business-focused, targeting payroll and accounting services in Latvia.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No social media links or email contacts found in the provided HTML snippet.
  10. Site design is professional with good branding consistency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional tech stack with jQuery 3.5.1 and Lightcase.js for UI components, and Google Analytics for tracking. The HTML structure is well-formed with embedded SVG and base64 images for logos and icons. Performance appears moderate with some large embedded images. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. SEO meta tags and structured data are not present or not detected in the provided snippet. No CMS or hosting provider information was found. Opportunities exist to modernize the stack, improve SEO, and enhance accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blv.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blv.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.