DRK-Blutspendedienst Baden-Württemberg – Hessen gemeinnützige Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung · Healthcare · Germany
Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.
The website www.blutspende.de represents the DRK-Blutspendedienst Baden-Württemberg – Hessen, a key regional entity within the German Red Cross responsible for coordinating blood donation services across Germany. The site serves as a nationwide distribution portal linking users to regional blood donation services, offering approximately 38,000 blood donation appointments annually. The target audience is the general German public interested in donating blood. The business operates as a non-profit healthcare service, playing a critical role in the national blood supply chain. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, leveraging modern web technologies and integrating Matomo analytics with a consent management platform (CookieFirst) to ensure privacy compliance. The site is hosted on German infrastructure with nameservers pointing to nats.de, indicating a stable and localized hosting environment. The website demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, with consistent branding and professional design. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, implements standard security headers, and uses a cookie consent mechanism. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, as well as lack of incident response contacts and data protection officer information, represent areas for improvement in compliance and transparency. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professionally maintained, and fulfills its mission effectively. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and terms documents, establishing vulnerability disclosure channels, and enhancing transparency around data protection roles to strengthen user trust and regulatory compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
DKIM selector 's1' uses 768-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention blutspende.de, from OffSeq Breach.
3 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for blutspende.de.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with blutspende.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blutspende.de.