Skip to main content

Security report for bluenorth.dk

BLUE NORTH ApS · Energy · Denmark

Partial score · DNS & email only

13/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BLUE NORTH ApS is a Danish company specializing in effective flow measurement and overflow registration solutions to ensure safe water supply. The company targets water utilities and organizations requiring precise water flow monitoring, positioning itself as a niche provider in the energy sector focused on water supply safety. Founded in 2014, the company maintains a small business profile with a focused service offering. The website is built on WordPress, utilizing common SEO and performance optimization plugins such as Yoast SEO and WP Rocket, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Analytics and tracking are implemented via Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight Tag, reflecting standard marketing practices. Security posture shows room for improvement, with no DNSSEC enabled and absence of security headers. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

4 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
3of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bluenorth.dk

This scan found 13 issues across 2 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

Security headers
15
GDPR outside view
10
Average
13

Not counted

  • SSL/TLS: did not complete in this scan.
  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • Network security: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy sector with a focus on water supply safety through flow measurement technology. Its business model is B2B, serving utilities and organizations needing water monitoring solutions. The market position is niche, with specialized services in flow measurement and overflow registration. The website's digital presence is consistent with a small enterprise, leveraging WordPress CMS and SEO tools to reach its audience. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data. The company appears to maintain a focused operational scope with potential growth opportunities in expanding digital security and compliance transparency.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses asynchronous script loading to optimize performance and security. However, it lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and explicit privacy and security policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance and overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness for security events. Tracking technologies are present, but privacy compliance is minimal. The security score reflects these gaps, suggesting moderate risk. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the provided data.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service documents accessible from the website.
  4. Add incident response contact information and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any potential vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BLUE NORTH ApS
Description
BLUE NORTH ApS provides effective flow measurement and overflow registration solutions to ensure safe water supply.
Key services
Flow measurement, Overflow registration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, WordPress, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of async loading for scripts
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, WP Rocket
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the main page or in metadata.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via a third-party script.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with common SEO and performance plugins.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data; DNSSEC is not enabled.
  7. External scripts include Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight for analytics and tracking.
  8. No visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain is active, registered since 2014, expires in 2026, with no DNSSEC.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and WP Rocket plugins, indicating a modern and SEO-optimized infrastructure. External scripts include Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight Tag for analytics and marketing. The site uses asynchronous script loading to improve performance. Mobile optimization is good, and the design quality is professional. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security best practices. Performance is moderate, with opportunities to enhance loading speed and accessibility features. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires improvements in security and compliance to reduce risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bluenorth.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bluenorth.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.