BloteKutjes.com is an adult content website offering free Dutch pornographic videos in HD quality. The platform targets adult users interested in free regional adult content and monetizes primarily through advertising and affiliate marketing with numerous external adult sites linked. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including HTTPS, Google Fonts, and Google Tag Manager for analytics, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy policies, which are critical for user trust and compliance. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant information raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency, which impacts overall business credibility. The website's design and content quality are basic, with moderate navigation clarity and mobile optimization.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
48
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention blotekutjes.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for blotekutjes.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The website operates in the niche adult media sector, focusing on free Dutch-language pornographic videos. Its business model relies on free content distribution combined with affiliate marketing partnerships with numerous adult sites. The lack of clear company information, privacy policies, and terms of service suggests a low level of formal business transparency. The target audience is adult consumers seeking free adult videos, and the site competes in a crowded market with similar free adult content providers. The extensive use of affiliate links indicates a revenue stream dependent on user referrals. The absence of social media presence and limited contact information further limits brand trust and growth potential.
Security posture
The site enforces HTTPS, which is a positive security baseline. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which could expose users to risks like clickjacking or content injection. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating poor compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, implying user tracking without clear consent mechanisms. The absence of incident response contacts or security policies further weakens the security posture. Overall, the site demonstrates a basic security level but requires significant improvements to protect users and comply with regulations.
Recommendations
Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
Publish terms of service and incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
Obtain and publish valid WHOIS domain registration information or use legitimate privacy protection services with justification.
Enhance website design and content quality to improve user experience and professional appearance.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Description
Blote Kutjes offers free pornographic videos, specifically Dutch adult content in HD. It provides a platform for free porn films from the Netherlands.
Key services
Free pornographic video streaming, Video categorization and sorting, Affiliate linking to partner adult sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate
Technology
Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Montserrat), Google Tag Manager (gtag.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
No visible exposed sensitive data
No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low
Key observations
Website is an adult content platform focused on free Dutch porn videos.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on site.
Contact information limited to a webmaster email in footer with obfuscated format.
Multiple external affiliate links to adult sites present.
Uses HTTPS with Google Tag Manager for analytics.
No security headers detected; site could improve security posture.
WHOIS data unavailable, raising legitimacy concerns.
No social media or phone contact information found.
Site design and content quality are basic with moderate navigation clarity.
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, and Google Tag Manager. It loads content over HTTPS with no visible performance issues, indicating moderate loading speed. The site is mobile optimized with viewport meta tags and responsive CSS. However, it lacks advanced accessibility features and SEO optimizations beyond basic meta tags and Open Graph data. The absence of a CMS or framework identification suggests a custom or lightweight platform. The site relies heavily on external CDN and affiliate domains for content and monetization. Technical debt appears low but security and privacy technical implementations need enhancement.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with blotekutjes.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blotekutjes.com.