Skip to main content

Security report for blodtjanst.fi

Blodtjänst · Healthcare · Finland

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Blodtjänst is the centralized national blood service organization in Finland, operating under the Finnish Red Cross. The website serves blood donors, healthcare professionals, and the general public by providing information on blood donation, stem cell registry, blood products, and related healthcare services. It holds a strong market position as the official blood service provider in Finland, emphasizing life-saving activities and community health. The site is multilingual, with Swedish as the analyzed language, and offers comprehensive resources including booking appointments, health declarations, and educational content. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bulma CSS and uses essential third-party services such as Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement, cookie consent with granular controls, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The security posture is strong, with good SSL configuration and security best practices observed. However, there is no explicit security policy or incident response contact published, which could be improved. Privacy compliance is robust, with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. Business credibility is high, supported by official branding, clear contact information, and social media presence. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with excellent professionalism and trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include publishing a dedicated security policy, incident response details, and implementing a security.txt file to enhance transparency and vulnerability management.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blodtjanst.fi

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
88
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention blodtjanst.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for blodtjanst.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Blodtjänst operates as a non-profit healthcare entity focused on blood donation and related services in Finland. Its competitive advantage lies in its official status under the Finnish Red Cross, centralized national reach, and comprehensive service offerings including stem cell registry and advanced cell therapy. The business model is service-oriented, relying on voluntary blood donors and partnerships with healthcare providers. Revenue streams are likely government or public funding and donations. The target customer segments include blood donors, patients requiring transfusions, healthcare professionals, and researchers. Growth indicators include digital service enhancements like the blood donor app and expanded research activities. The partnership ecosystem includes the Finnish Red Cross and specialized sites for donor recruitment and materials. Operationally, the organization demonstrates strong governance, compliance, and community engagement.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of security-focused cookie consent management. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The presence of detailed cookie categories and consent mechanisms indicates compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page and incident response contacts limits transparency. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from formalizing incident response and disclosure processes to enhance trust and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide explicit incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance security headers with explicit reporting and monitoring mechanisms.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Blodtjänst
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Blodtjänst
Description
Blodtjänst har ett centraliserat ansvar för blodtjänstverksamheten i hela landet. Vi skapar möjligheter att rädda liv.
Key services
Blood donation, Stem cell registry, Blood products and transfusion services, Laboratory services, Research and development
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Bulma CSS framework, WordPress CMS
Frameworks
Bulma
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-focused cookie consent tool (Cookiebot)
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Spotify analytics, Facebook analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, YouTube tracking, Spotify tracking
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent with detailed categories and controls
  3. Multiple language support with clear language alternates
  4. Strong presence of official branding and trust signals
  5. Use of modern web technologies and compliance tools
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  7. Contact information is clear and consistent
  8. Social media presence on major platforms enhances trust
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bulma CSS framework and uses jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. Cookiebot is employed for cookie consent management, providing granular user control. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with modern fonts and optimized images. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but hosting provider details are not explicit. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience aligned with the organization's mission.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blodtjanst.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blodtjanst.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.