Skip to main content

Security report for blm.de

Bayerische Landeszentrale für neue Medien (BLM) · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Bayerische Landeszentrale für neue Medien (BLM) is the official regulatory authority overseeing private radio, television, and online media offerings in Bavaria, Germany. The website serves as a comprehensive portal providing information on licensing, youth and user protection, advertising regulation, media research, and public communication. It targets media professionals, private broadcasters, and the general Bavarian public. The site is well-positioned as a trusted government entity with a clear mission and extensive service offerings. Technically, the website is built on the CONTENS CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and SVG icons. It features responsive design optimized for mobile devices and includes accessibility considerations. The site employs HTTPS and integrates etracker analytics with a user consent mechanism, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes basic security headers, though there is room for enhancement with additional headers like Content-Security-Policy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear privacy and cookie policies and a consent banner. However, no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies were found. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, security, and compliance appropriate for a government regulatory body. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and adding a vulnerability disclosure policy to further strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blm.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BLM operates as a government regulatory authority in the media sector within Bavaria, Germany. Its market position is authoritative and essential for private broadcasters and media intermediaries in the region. The business model is regulatory and public service-oriented, focusing on licensing, compliance enforcement, media promotion, and public information. Revenue streams are likely government-funded. The target audience includes broadcasters, media professionals, and the Bavarian public. The website reflects a stable and mature organization with consistent branding and comprehensive content. Partnerships with media platforms and intermediaries are indicated through linked content but no explicit partner domains were identified. The organization shows commitment to media quality, youth protection, and innovation.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and basic security headers. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy indicates compliance with GDPR requirements. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of etracker analytics is transparent and consent-based. However, the absence of advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and a public incident response contact or vulnerability disclosure policy suggests areas for improvement. Overall, the security maturity is appropriate for a government entity but could be enhanced to meet best practices fully.

Recommendations

  1. Implement advanced security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated incident response and security contact page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure no privacy or security risks.
  5. Enhance mobile accessibility features and conduct periodic penetration testing to maintain security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bayerische Landeszentrale für neue Medien (BLM)
Description
Die Bayerische Landeszentrale für neue Medien (BLM) genehmigt die privaten Hörfunk- und Fernsehangebote sowie Online-Angebote in Bayern.
Key services
Licensing private radio and TV broadcasters, Youth and user protection, Advertising regulation, Media research and promotion, Public information and events
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, SVG icons, etracker analytics
Frameworks
CONTENS CMS 5.7.6
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent mechanism for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
etracker
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
etracker
Marketing tools
etracker analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to media regulation in Bavaria.
  3. Clear privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  5. No critical security issues detected.
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by CONTENS CMS version 5.7.6, indicating a mature content management system tailored for enterprise or government use. The tech stack includes modern JavaScript and CSS, with SVG icons for UI elements. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, likely due to comprehensive content and analytics integration. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting details are not explicit, but DNS uses professional German name servers. No legacy or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided HTML. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and secure web presence suitable for a government regulatory body.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blm.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blm.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.