Skip to main content

Security report for blackpeakgroup.com

ION Analytics · Finance · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ION Analytics operates as an enterprise-level financial intelligence platform integrating multiple specialized services such as Mergermarket, Debtwire, Dealogic, and Blackpeak under the ION Group umbrella. The company targets capital markets participants including advisors, banks, corporates, investors, and lawyers, providing predictive analytics and market intelligence to empower decision-making. The website reflects a strong market position as a pioneer in combining human insight with machine intelligence for capital markets transformation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and uses various JavaScript libraries for enhanced user experience. Hosting is supported by Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure. While the site is rich in content and well-structured, performance is somewhat slow due to large page size and numerous resources. SEO and mobile optimization are well addressed, though accessibility is basic. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, TLS 1.3 support, OCSP stapling, and strong SPF and DMARC email policies. However, improvements such as enabling HSTS, DNSSEC, and CAA records would enhance security further. Privacy compliance is robust, featuring a comprehensive privacy policy, GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms, and detailed user controls. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism and trustworthiness with clear business information and multiple trust signals. No critical security issues or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access and analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blackpeakgroup.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ION Analytics holds a strong market position as an integrator of multiple financial intelligence services, leveraging AI and human expertise to serve a sophisticated clientele in capital markets. The business model is subscription and service-based, offering predictive analytics and due diligence solutions. The company benefits from a broad partnership ecosystem including subsidiaries like Mergermarket and Debtwire, enhancing its competitive advantage. The platform's extensive content and event offerings indicate active engagement with its target audience and a focus on thought leadership. Growth indicators include continuous content updates and integration of advanced analytics technologies.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, support for modern TLS protocols, and no detected SSL vulnerabilities. Email security is strengthened by SPF and DMARC with a reject policy, reducing phishing risks. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy indicates compliance with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of DNSSEC and CAA records represents potential areas for improvement. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which could be a gap in transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from enhanced transparency and additional DNS security measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and ensure domain integrity.
  3. Add Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) DNS records to restrict which CAs can issue certificates for the domain.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and various JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Masonry, Highstock, Lity, and Wow.js for interactive and visual enhancements. Hosting is supported by Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure, providing reliable domain resolution. The site has a large page size (~2.3MB) and many resources (341), resulting in slow load times (~18 seconds), indicating potential for optimization. SEO is well implemented with Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Cookie consent and GDPR compliance are managed via WebToffee GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blackpeakgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blackpeakgroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.