Skip to main content

Security report for bjt.lv

“OVERSEAS Estates” SIA · Energy · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Baltic Juice Terminal (BJT) operates as a specialized logistics and terminal service provider for frozen concentrated orange juice (FCOJ) and related beverage products, located in the Free Port of Ventspils, Latvia. The company targets businesses involved in juice concentrate transshipment, blending, cold storage, and forwarding primarily serving CIS, Eastern Europe, and Russian markets. The website presents basic business information with limited digital sophistication. Technically, the website is built on outdated HTML standards with minimal JavaScript usage and lacks modern CMS or frameworks. It shows basic performance and poor mobile optimization. Tracking is minimal, limited to a CQ Counter pixel. No advanced analytics or marketing tools are detected. The absence of HTTPS and security headers indicates a weak security posture. Security-wise, the site lacks critical protections such as HTTPS, privacy and cookie policies, and security headers. No forms or interactive elements reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy verification. Contact information is provided, but no incident response or security policy details are available. Overall, the website is functional but basic, with significant room for improvement in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization. The risk level is moderate due to missing HTTPS and privacy controls, which should be addressed to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bjt.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BJT is positioned as a niche terminal operator in the beverage logistics sector, focusing on frozen concentrated orange juice. Its competitive advantage lies in its location at the Free Port of Ventspils and specialization in FCOJ handling. The business model revolves around providing terminal services including transshipment, blending, cold storage, and forwarding. Revenue likely derives from logistics and storage fees. The target customers are beverage producers, importers/exporters, and logistics companies in the Baltic and CIS regions. The company appears small with no visible subsidiaries or parent company. The website's limited digital presence suggests a traditional business approach with minimal online marketing or e-commerce capabilities.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak. The lack of HTTPS exposes users to potential interception risks. No security headers or privacy policies are present, indicating poor compliance with modern security and privacy standards such as GDPR. The absence of incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms further reduces security maturity. Minimal tracking reduces privacy concerns but also limits analytics. The site does not expose sensitive data or forms, which lowers immediate risk but also limits functionality. Overall, the security culture appears minimal and reactive rather than proactive.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all site traffic.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience and SEO.
  5. Establish incident response contact channels and consider publishing a security policy or vulnerability disclosure statement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
“OVERSEAS Estates” SIA
Description
BALTIC JUICE TERMINAL is the most modern FCOJ terminal in the world located in the Free Port of Ventspils, Latvia.
Key services
FCOJ terminal operations, Transshipment, Blending, Cold storage, Logistics, Stevedoring, Forwarding
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML 4/Transitional (XHTML namespace), JavaScript (basic inline scripts), CQ Counter tracking pixel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
CQ Counter
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CQ Counter
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
  2. Website is a basic informational site for a juice terminal company in Latvia
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No HTTPS or security headers detected from HTML content alone
  5. Minimal tracking via CQ Counter pixel
  6. No forms or interactive elements present
  7. Contact info includes company email and phone with Latvian country code
  8. No social media links found
  9. Site uses outdated HTML standards and lacks mobile optimization
  10. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses outdated XHTML transitional markup and inline JavaScript for basic tracking. No modern frameworks or CMS are detected. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern coding practices. The hosting provider and SSL configuration are unknown due to limited data. The site uses a third-party CQ Counter tracking pixel but no advanced analytics or marketing tools. Technical debt is evident in the lack of modern standards and security best practices, presenting modernization opportunities to improve security, compliance, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bjt.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bjt.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.