Skip to main content

Security report for bjraw.com

KB Productions LLC · Media · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BJRaw is a niche adult entertainment website specializing in explicit blowjob and oral sex content, offering exclusive videos and photo galleries through a subscription membership model. The company behind the site, KB Productions LLC, is based in Scottsdale, Arizona, and the domain registration aligns with this business information. The site leverages modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and integrates analytics tools like Matomo and Google Analytics for user tracking. Payment processing is handled by reputable third-party agents including Epoch and Segpay, enhancing transactional trust. Security practices include HTTPS enforcement and clientTransferProhibited domain status, though there is room for improvement in DNS security and HTTP headers. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience for its target adult audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bjraw.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the adult media sector with a focused content niche, maintaining a small but consistent market presence since 2020. Its competitive advantage lies in exclusive content and recognized industry awards. The subscription model generates recurring revenue, supported by a partner ecosystem for payments and live cam services. The site targets adult consumers interested in explicit oral sex content, with active social media engagement on Instagram and Twitter. Growth indicators include regular content updates and integration of analytics for user behavior insights. Strategic partnerships with payment processors and content platforms strengthen operational reliability.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of visible security headers such as CSP or HSTS represent potential vulnerabilities. No explicit incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating gaps in formal security governance. Privacy compliance is limited, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and detailed data protection disclosures. The use of Matomo analytics suggests some control over data collection, but overall privacy practices could be enhanced. The site would benefit from implementing comprehensive security headers, DNS security, and formal incident response contacts to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate risks proactively.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
KB Productions LLC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KB Productions LLC
Description
BJRaw is an adult entertainment website specializing in explicit blowjob and oral sex videos featuring popular porn stars. The site offers exclusive content with new videos added weekly, targeting adult audiences interested in this niche.
Key services
Exclusive adult videos, Photo galleries, Membership access, Live cams via partner site
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Matomo Analytics, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Bootstrap
Frameworks
Next.js, Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • 256-bit encryption claimed for membership
  • Discreet billing

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content membership site with exclusive videos and photos.
  2. Content is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  3. No cookie consent banner found, which may affect privacy compliance.
  4. Security headers are not explicitly visible in the HTML content.
  5. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business information.
  6. Multiple social media links to Instagram and Twitter are present.
  7. Payment processing is handled by authorized agents Epoch and Segpay.
  8. Site uses modern web technologies including Next.js and React.
  9. Matomo analytics is used for user tracking and heatmaps.
  10. Terms and conditions and privacy policy are available but basic.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js framework with server-side rendering capabilities, ensuring good performance and SEO optimization. Hosting on AWS infrastructure provides scalability and reliability. The site uses Bootstrap for responsive design and Font Awesome for icons, contributing to a consistent and professional UI. Analytics integration with Matomo and Google Analytics enables detailed user tracking and behavior analysis. However, the lack of CMS suggests a custom-built solution, which may require dedicated maintenance. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, and accessibility features are basic but present. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bjraw.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bjraw.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.